in some countries, it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants for their age. Is this a positive or negtive development?
In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards legislation aimed at preventing
age
Use synonyms
discrimination
in the workplace. Some countries have enacted Use synonyms
laws
making it illegal for companies to reject Use synonyms
job
applicants based solely on their Use synonyms
age
. Use synonyms
While
Linking Words
this
development is undoubtedly a positive step towards promoting equality and fairness in employment opportunities, it Linking Words
also
raises certain concerns and considerations.
On the positive side, prohibiting companies from discriminating against Linking Words
job
applicants based on Use synonyms
age
fosters a more inclusive and diverse workforce. By removing arbitrary barriers related to Use synonyms
age
, Use synonyms
individuals
of all generations have an equal chance to compete for employment opportunities based on their qualifications, skills, and merits. Use synonyms
This
not only benefits older workers who may Linking Words
otherwise
face Linking Words
age
-related biases but Use synonyms
also
contributes to a more dynamic and innovative work environment where different perspectives and experiences are valued.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, Linking Words
such
legislation helps combat ageism, which is a pervasive issue in many societies. Ageism, like other forms of Linking Words
discrimination
, can have detrimental effects on Use synonyms
individuals
' self-esteem, mental well-being, and economic security. By enacting Use synonyms
laws
that protect Use synonyms
individuals
from Use synonyms
age
-based Use synonyms
discrimination
, governments signal their commitment to upholding human rights and promoting social justice.
Use synonyms
However
, despite these positive aspects, there are Linking Words
also
some potential drawbacks to consider. Critics argue that prohibiting companies from considering Linking Words
age
as a factor in hiring decisions may inadvertently hinder their ability to make informed choices based on Use synonyms
job
requirements and organizational needs. Use synonyms
For instance
, certain industries may prioritize hiring younger candidates with relevant technical skills or older candidates with extensive experience, depending on the nature of the Linking Words
job
and the company's goals.
Use synonyms
Moreover
, enforcing Linking Words
laws
against Use synonyms
age
Use synonyms
discrimination
presents practical challenges for employers, particularly in industries where Use synonyms
age
may be a legitimate factor in assessing Use synonyms
job
performance and suitability. Use synonyms
For example
, physically demanding occupations or roles that require frequent travel may have Linking Words
age
-related considerations that employers need to take into account for health and safety reasons.
In conclusion, Use synonyms
while
the prohibition of Linking Words
age
Use synonyms
discrimination
in hiring practices represents a positive development towards promoting equality and inclusivity in the workplace, it Use synonyms
also
presents certain complexities and considerations. Striking a balance between protecting Linking Words
individuals
from Use synonyms
discrimination
and accommodating legitimate employer needs and concerns is essential. Ultimately, effective implementation and enforcement of anti-Use synonyms
discrimination
Use synonyms
laws
, Use synonyms
coupled with
ongoing efforts to raise awareness and foster diversity and inclusion, are crucial for creating a more equitable and harmonious work environment for people of all ages.Linking Words
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Include more specific examples or case studies from countries where age discrimination laws have been successfully implemented. This will help illustrate your points more clearly.
coherence cohesion
While the essay is well-organized, make sure to transition smoothly between points. Adding transition phrases can help with this.
task achievement
The essay provides a well-rounded discussion of both the positive and negative aspects of age discrimination laws.
coherence cohesion
The structure of the essay is logical, with clear distinctions between the introduction, body, and conclusion.
task achievement
The essay effectively uses a balanced argument to discuss the complexities of age discrimination in the workplace.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.