Some people believe that the best way to deal with heavy traffic in city centers is for privately owned cars to be banned, others however, think this is an unrealistic solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is no doubt
traffic
congestion is a major concern in city
downtowns. However
, while
some believe that this
problem could be resolved by forbidding private cars
from entering the centres
, I think this
solution is impractical and unfeasible.
Firstly
, the public is highly suggested to select public transport
when travelling to city
centres
instead
of using privately owned cars
to alleviate heavy traffic
. This
is because there is usually limited road space in city
hubs while
the amount of passengers and vehicles could be tremendous. For instance
, some cities advise commuters to use a park-and-ride service which allows them to park their vehicles at a transport
connection and then
take public transport
such
as trains and trams to go to the centres
. The argument goes that if cars
were banned from entering the centres
, there would be fewer traffic
jams.
Nevertheless
, I think stopping people from driving their own cars
to the downtowns is an impractical idea for several reasons. First and foremost, many people may not have access to public transport
, and driving by themselves might be the only possible way to get to city
centres
for work, study, or running errands. Secondly
, driving one's own car in most cases is more time-efficient compared to using public transport
as there seems to be more variations for the latter. For example
, it is reported that travellers in Melbourne frequently encounter unexpected road modifications or changes in time when they take a train. Conversely
, driving one's own car allows more flexibility and drivers can make adjustments in the face of unexpected situations.
In conclusion, although
getting rid of private cars
in city
centres
might drastically reduce traffic
jams, this
is an unrealistic suggestion on the basis that travellers have to take into consideration public transport
accessibility and time efficiency.Submitted by runyaokou on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay would benefit from a slightly more in-depth discussion of the opposing viewpoint. Consider adding another supporting point or example for the view that banning private cars is not practical, to balance the argument sections more effectively.
task achievement
While your ideas are clearly presented, try to make your supporting arguments even more robust with additional specific examples or data. This will strengthen your position and showcase your ability to provide detailed support for your viewpoints.
introduction conclusion present
Your essay contains a well-defined introduction and conclusion, which effectively summarize your main points and provide a clear resolution to the discussion.
supported main points
You have effectively supported your main points with relevant examples, such as the park-and-ride service and the public transport issues in Melbourne.
logical structure
The logical structure of your essay is clear, and your arguments flow well from one point to the next. Your use of linking phrases, such as "Firstly" and "Nevertheless," helps guide the reader through your argument.