Some people believe that the best way to deal with heavy traffic in city centres is for privately owned cars to be banned, others however, think this is an unrealistic solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The severity of
traffic
has been highlighted over the past decades. From
this
aspect, some opine that the best method to deal with heavy
traffic
in urban is to prohibit privately owned cars, but others hold the view that
this
is not a feasible solution.
This
essay will explore both views and
then
my personal opinion will be suggested. It is often pointed out that the best method to cope with severe
traffic
in urban centres is to prohibit privately owned cars. Proponents of
this
argument suggest that an increase in the utilisation of public transport occurs.
This
is because the implementation of
vehicle
prohibition encourages citizens to use public transportation, which mitigates
traffic
congestion. What is more, each driver is more likely to temporarily stop driving their vehicles in order to comply with the ban.
This
obviously leads them to stay at the house or utilise public transport
instead
of driving, and
this
in turn brings about a reduction in heavy
traffic
on the roads.
Nevertheless
, some opponents insist that banning the private
vehicle
is not a practical solution.
Although
the benefits of controlling vehicles on the road cannot be overlooked, drivers may experience significant difficulties. A pertinent example of
this
is that they may need to drive on special occasions
such
as medical emergencies, urgent criminal situations, or when moving heavy luggage.
This
,
therefore
, results in them being imposed heavy fines and penalties, causing unnecessary stress.
Moreover
, a majority of citizens and
vehicle
corporations would oppose
this
policy, since they have owned and driven their cars for a long time, and each driver faces inconvenience in their daily lives, so potentially leading to protests against the ban. To recapitulate, I believe that banning private vehicles is not a practical solution because drivers may experience significant difficulties, and a majority of citizens and
vehicle
corporations would oppose
this
policy.
Thus
, the government should not enact
traffic
laws but
instead
find alternative ways to mitigate heavy
traffic
.
Submitted by subin12260 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
While your essay provides a complete response to the task, try to incorporate more relevant and specific examples to support your arguments. This will make your ideas more compelling and grounded.
coherence cohesion
Work on crafting smoother transitions between paragraphs to enhance the flow of ideas. This will improve the overall coherence of your essay.
coherence cohesion
Your essay presents a clear structure with a strong introduction and conclusion, making your main points easily understandable.
task achievement
You offer a balanced discussion of both views before presenting your own opinion, which shows a clear understanding of the task.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: