Some people believe that the best way to deal with heavy traffic in city centers is for privately owned cars to be banned, others however, think this is an unrealistic solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Heavy

traffic

is one of the most annoying problems that the

city

centre population may suffer from.

Such

a crisis may occur

due to

several factors. Many humans agree with the idea that preventing private

cars

would be a great solution,

while

others consider

this

solution unrealistic. I partially agree with

this

idea. Both points of view are to be debated in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, people who believe that banning private

cars

can overcome

traffic

in the

city

centres have a valid point of view, as decreasing the number of

cars

that are using the main roads can lead to a significant reduction in

traffic

respectively. Meanwhile,

this

is difficult to be applied, but usage of public transportation can sustain the private

cars

efficiently with no retardation for the employees to reach their worksite.

On the other hand

, many people opine banning owned vehicles is inapplicable as the public transportation in return will be catastrophically crowded,

as a result

,

this

could affect society negatively as the workers will not be able to be in their jobs at the time, so workers have to wake up earlier in order to compensate for the delay resulting from public

traffic

, ultimately

this

will result in futile performance in the job as workers will experience fatigue during working hours. In conclusion, decreasing private vehicles can affect positively

city

center

traffic

,

however

, If urban transportation is not well-developed enough to accommodate the numerous people using it the

city

will face a disaster. Despite

this

debate, I suggest building a side

city

housing

that is

connected to the

city

centre with trains and buses.