Some people believe that the best way to deal with heavy traffic in city centers is for privately owned cars to be banned, others however, think this is an unrealistic solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Crowded traffic has been a concern in huge cities' downtowns,

while

some think it could be solved by forbidding private

cars

from getting into the city centre, others believe that

this

can't be the

solution

. We have to take into account paramount points

such

as freedom, development and citizens' satisfaction in order to find a fair response to

this

matter. First of all, banning car owners is a restriction that will only bring more and diverse problems like people protesting for their fundamental right to free mobility.

Although

this

will reduce the heavy traffic, citizens trying to buy their basic needs or even the shop owners will be affected by

this

measure.

Furthermore

,

this

kind of movement limitations could highly impact the economic development in the banned area, as an illustration, in cities where

this

decision has been taken, businesses and stores have seen a fall quantity in sales

hence

some of them have had to close their places or in better conditions fire some of their workers affecting the entire community. Taking

this

into account, governments have to look for a

solution

which encompasses not only the way

cars

and different kinds of transport move around the city, but the public satisfaction surrounding

this

matter,

for instance

, they can invest in infrastructure to make the roads wider, permitting a high number of

cars

moving at the same time

as a result

.

To conclude

, in my opinion, banning private

cars

is not the best

solution

to

this

issue. governments have to widen their scope and bring a fair

solution

for everybody, better and wider routes are a good beginning.