In contemporary times, one school of thought holds that tracking and taking photos of celebrities everywhere by paparazzi for a long time is a privacy offence and should be banned,
whereas
others assert that Linking Words
this
is the price of reputation. Linking Words
This
essay attempts to shed light on both perspectives before concluding that I am in favour of the former notion.
On the one hand, it is understandable why people believe the famous ones should accept the fact that being stalked is a part of their jobs. First and foremost, being photographed is inevitable. In fact, there are laws that allow taking pictures in public places, which means various reporters can photo the celebrities legally Linking Words
as well as
provide insights into their lives. Linking Words
Furthermore
, these photos could indirectly develop the careers of artists. Linking Words
For example
, those pictures could enhance the image of a celebrity in the public eye. Thereby, they could receive more working opportunities Linking Words
as well as
increased salaries from their employment.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, there are compelling reasons why I am convinced that excessive paparazzi should be controlled in certain circumstances. One rationale is that those followers could negatively affect the mental health of superstars. Linking Words
For example
, if well-known people were tracked for days and nights, they might feel insecure, Linking Words
Correct word choice
and lacking
lacking
personal space and privacy, which could create serious mental consequences Wrong verb form
lack
such
as stress, anxiety, or even suicide. Another justification is that these images could reveal important private information, Linking Words
such
as the address of their home, their routines, or even their children's school, which could be used for bad intentions that might harm their lives and assets greatly.
In conclusion, it is irrefutable that a paparazzi's role brings several merits to well-known individuals and the entertainment industry, I would contend that an invasion of privacy could cause irreparable damage.Linking Words
khoihoangtrong96