It is popularly believed in society that residents have the right of self-managing their income,
instead
of spending on taxes. The writer of Linking Words
this
essay disagrees with Linking Words
this
statement, primarily Linking Words
due to
the importance of social welfare. Linking Words
However
, others are opposed to Linking Words
this
belief when it comes to personal satisfaction.
It must be acknowledged that tax money is the purpose of investing in collective benefits. To put it simply, if authorities aim to enhance the living standards of communities, the provision of social services Linking Words
as well as
public infrastructure must take place. Linking Words
As a result
, the funding for these initiatives should be mostly sponsored by the citizens since its orientation is to ensure equal and sustainable support for all. Take Vietnam as a contextual example where its government encourages every individual to contribute to free vaccination programs, resulting in providing everyone, especially the poor with health guarantees.
Many hold the opinion of letting themselves allocate their expenditure to fulfil the sense of accomplishment. It is because of their hard-working efforts to earn a living that they may prefer to reward themselves rather than subsidise community welfare. Linking Words
This
point may be valid, but if Linking Words
this
situation continued, Linking Words
this
essential assistance would be underfunded. Linking Words
Consequently
, it will likely lead to social instability and increase inequality in terms of living conditions between the rich and poor. Linking Words
Therefore
, regardless of serving personal interests, it is crucial to live for a better future for society.
In conclusion, paying taxes is assumed to play a vital role in the authority of a country so as to afford social support. Contrastingly, despite Linking Words
this
moral purpose, some suppose that it is not their prior duty toward the public,compared to investing in themselvesLinking Words
Nghỉ hè vui vẻ cả nhà