Some people say that what individuals do to protect cannot make difference, others say that individuals can protect environment. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
Opinions differ on whether individual efforts are inconsequential in the face of larger-scale environmental issues, or whether collective actions by individuals can indeed foster substantial change. I will discuss both views and give my own opinion in
this
essay.
On one hand, there's the argument that individual actions are futile in the face of large-scale industrial pollution and government policies that often prioritize economic growth over environmental concerns. Critics of individual action often point out that while
recycling, reducing energy consumption, and using eco-friendly products are all positive steps, they are ultimately insignificant compared to the environmental impact of industries and governments. Moreover
, systemic alteration is frequently seen as fundamental to addressing issues like climate alteration and biodiversity misfortune. This
requires approach changes, universal participation, and shifts in mechanical hones that people may have a constrained impact on.
In any case, defenders of person activity contend that collective alter starts with person's
choices. They accept that on the off chance that sufficient individuals embrace maintainable propensities and request naturally mindful items and arrangements, it can make a swell impact that impacts businesses and governments. Correct article usage
a person's
Also
, personal activities
can have substantial benefits at a neighbourhood level, such
as lessening contamination in communities and protecting normal territories.
In my conclusion, both viewpoints are justified. Whereas
it's genuine that systemic alter is significant for tending to large-scale natural challenges, personal activities
ought to not be belittled. Each positive alter, no matter how little, contributes to the bigger objective of natural maintainability. Besides
, personal activities
can motivate others and contribute to a culture of natural mindfulness and obligation. Hence
, whereas
people may not be able to single-handedly unravel natural issues, their activities
are still profitable and significant within the broader setting of securing the planet.Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Overall, your essay provides a completeresponse to the task and offers a balanced discussion of both views. However, incorporating more specific examples could enhance your arguments.
coherence cohesion
Your logical structure is solid. To further improve, consider refining the transitional phrases and ensuring each paragraph connects seamlessly to the next.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction sets the context and clearly states the intent to discuss both views and provide an opinion.
task achievement
The essay covers both perspectives comprehensively, offering a balanced discussion.