Some people believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not have to pay tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many are of the opinion that citizens should maintain all their income rather than paying
taxation
to the government
due to
their financial difficulties,
However
, I am largely in disagreement with
this
perspective since imposing the proper amount of
tax
depending on personal
finances
can encourage economic disparity in society to strike a balance. Advocates argue that authorities must not put taxes on the public since individuals deserve to save all their incomes considering the unstable financial crisis in the modern era. With economic instability
such
as inflation, rising costs of living, and soaring apartment prices, numerous citizens are struggling with their deficient
finances
spent on essential items
such
as food, house renting fees, and utility fees.
Consequently
,
taxation
would make them grapple with financial difficulties and place
the
Correct article usage
a
show examples
monetary burden on them.
Therefore
, saving individual salaries and wages for their basic needs can be a more effective way to ease personal financial burdens. Despite the aforementioned points, critics insist that must of
taxation
is required for the imbalance between the marginalized communities and the upper classes since paying taxes to the nations can address the economic inequality
This
financial difference mostly arises from the social background that the more socially high-positioned people
such
as doctors, lawyers, and technicians make a significant amount of money, the less low-class employees
such
as manual labours, factory workers, and cleaners earn income.
Consequently
, gaining
tax
depending on individual
finances
can make a considerable contribution to narrowing
such
a large gap in the economic state.
This
should be achieved by the process that a large amount of received
tax
from higher incomers is allocated towards offering shelters, subsidies, and food to disadvantaged groups
such
as the homeless and those who barely make ends meet.
Hence
,
this
concerted effort will perpetuate a virtuous cycle in society, mitigating economic disparity. In conclusion,
while
is undeniably true that
taxation
can be a financial burden on workers who make less salaries
due to
a lack of
finances
for basic living.
However
, I firmly believe that
tax
can be financed depending on individual economic states and
such
collected taxes can be directed towards the poor citizens, leading to financial equality.
Submitted by uzookim on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Some sentences are overly complex and can be simplified for better clarity. This will improve the coherence of your argument.
task achievement
The essay could benefit from more specific examples to support the main points, which would strengthen the argument.
task achievement
While the essay addresses the prompt well, consider refining your topic sentences to ensure each paragraph's main idea is clearly communicated.
task achievement
The essay presents a clear thesis statement in the introduction, indicating the writer's stance on the issue.
coherence cohesion
The essay maintains a logical structure with distinct paragraphs for introduction, main points, and conclusion.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion effectively summarizes the argument and restates the writer's position, which helps in reinforcing the viewpoint addressed in the essay.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • contribute
  • welfare
  • public services
  • progressive taxation
  • distribution of wealth
  • civic duty
  • social cohesion
  • tax evasion
  • economic disparities
  • social unrest
  • individual rights
  • societal responsibilities
What to do next:
Look at other essays: