In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices, and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
City planners usually organise infrastructures
according to
purpose. This
writer thinks the lack of vibrantness in such
cities and increased
cost Correct article usage
the increased
for
daily transportation outweigh the advantage of productivity it would bring.
In the first place, the mixed amenities in metropolitan places are what Change preposition
of
made
up the uniqueness of the whole area. What is more, social aspects of the zone would be more likely to expand as there are more buildings that serve both the need for leisure and commercial Wrong verb form
make
need
. Fix the agreement mistake
needs
This
can easily be seen in places like Paris or London, which are all successful and developed urban areas that offer lively living environments. Thus
, raising the satisfaction of current residents as opposed to an only purpose
accommodation neighbourhood.
The next thing about specific areas would be the rising cost of moving between destinations. Because a wide zone is dedicated to a certain aspect like workplaces or residential housing, people would find it inconvenient Add a hyphen
only-purpose
in travelling
. Change preposition
to travel
This
is the complete opposite to places where the amenities differ, for instance
, office workers could visit the local store on their way back home without needing to travel long distances. With that being said, having a variety in
metropolitans is one of the crucial things.
Taking all points into consideration, it is evident that the specific arrangement of buildings would decrease the livelihood and bring inconvenience to Change preposition
of
such
crowded sites like big cities and it outweighs the benefits. In conclusion, urban architecture should consider the planning of multiple types of infrastructure to ensure the satisfaction of citizens.Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay provides a complete response to the task, presenting both disadvantages and advantages of the policy. However, some points could be further elaborated to provide greater clarity and depth.
coherence cohesion
While your ideas are generally clear, there are a few places where your arguments could be presented in a more structured way. For example, explicitly stating your arguments in the introduction can help guide the reader through your essay.
task achievement
Including more specific examples or statistical data to support your points would enhance the relevance and specificity of your arguments.
coherence cohesion
Your essay includes a clear introduction and conclusion, which effectively frame your discussion.
coherence cohesion
The main points are well-supported by examples, such as the references to Paris and London.
coherence cohesion
The essay maintains a logical structure overall, with paragraphs dedicated to distinct points.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?