All companies should provide sports and social facilities to the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions vary on whether the provision of
sports
and social facilities
to the local community
should be an obligation for all companies
. Although
I may acknowledge the benefits of this
suggestion, I still firmly think that this
should not be mandatory for all.
Those who are in favor
of Change the spelling
favour
companies
providing sports
and social facilities
may have several cogent arguments. They may well argue that by doing so, companies
can enhance their public image. For instance
, Google, Apple, and other technology giants have been known to invest in local community
projects, which has boosted their reputation as organizations that fulfill
their corporate social responsibility. Change the spelling
fulfil
Furthermore
, providing sports
and social facilities
can have a direct positive impact on employees of the company. Access to these amenities can improve employee well-being, reduce stress, and increase overall
job satisfaction, which can make them more likely to be productive and engaged in their work and in turn ultimately benefits
the company.
Correct subject-verb agreement
benefit
Nevertheless
, I am firmly against the notion that all companies
should be responsible for providing these facilities
. One primary concern is that not all companies
have the financial capability to undertake such
initiatives. Small and medium-sized enterprises, in particular
, may struggle to allocate funds for community
projects without compromising their core business operations. Another reason is that the responsibility of providing sports
and social facilities
traditionally should mainly fall within the realm of government and public institutions as these entities are better positioned to assess community
needs and allocate resources accordingly
. While
corporate involvement is beneficial, it should complement, rather than replace, public efforts.
In conclusion, while
it is beneficial for companies
to provide sports
and social facilities
to the local community
, this
should not be an obligation for all companies
. Large corporations with the necessary resources can and should contribute to community
development as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives; however
, smaller businesses should not be compelled to undertake such
projects if it jeopardizes their financial stability.Submitted by [email protected] on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Ensure that both sides of the argument are consistently balanced. While the essay addresses both perspectives, providing additional counterarguments in favor of companies not providing facilities might strengthen the argument.
coherence cohesion
Make sure you clearly connect your ideas with varied and effective transition words to further enhance coherence.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are clearly present and effectively frame the essay.
coherence cohesion
The logical structure of the essay is well-organized and easy to follow.
task achievement
Relevant examples, such as mentioning Google and Apple, are provided to support the main points.
task achievement
Ideas are clearly and comprehensively explained, making the argument easy to understand.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!