All companies should provide sports and social facilities to the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Opinions vary on whether the provision of
sports
and social
facilities
to the local
community
should be an obligation for all
companies
.
Although
I may acknowledge the benefits of
this
suggestion, I still firmly think that
this
should not be mandatory for all. Those who are in
favor
Change the spelling
favour
show examples
of
companies
providing
sports
and social
facilities
may have several cogent arguments. They may well argue that by doing so,
companies
can enhance their public image.
For instance
, Google, Apple, and other technology giants have been known to invest in local
community
projects, which has boosted their reputation as organizations that
fulfill
Change the spelling
fulfil
show examples
their corporate social responsibility.
Furthermore
, providing
sports
and social
facilities
can have a direct positive impact on employees of the company. Access to these amenities can improve employee well-being, reduce stress, and increase
overall
job satisfaction, which can make them more likely to be productive and engaged in their work and in turn ultimately
benefits
Correct subject-verb agreement
benefit
show examples
the company.
Nevertheless
, I am firmly against the notion that all
companies
should be responsible for providing these
facilities
. One primary concern is that not all
companies
have the financial capability to undertake
such
initiatives. Small and medium-sized enterprises,
in particular
, may struggle to allocate funds for
community
projects without compromising their core business operations. Another reason is that the responsibility of providing
sports
and social
facilities
traditionally should mainly fall within the realm of government and public institutions as these entities are better positioned to assess
community
needs and allocate resources
accordingly
.
While
corporate involvement is beneficial, it should complement, rather than replace, public efforts. In conclusion,
while
it is beneficial for
companies
to provide
sports
and social
facilities
to the local
community
,
this
should not be an obligation for all
companies
. Large corporations with the necessary resources can and should contribute to
community
development as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives;
however
, smaller businesses should not be compelled to undertake
such
projects if it jeopardizes their financial stability.
Submitted by [email protected] on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Ensure that both sides of the argument are consistently balanced. While the essay addresses both perspectives, providing additional counterarguments in favor of companies not providing facilities might strengthen the argument.
coherence cohesion
Make sure you clearly connect your ideas with varied and effective transition words to further enhance coherence.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are clearly present and effectively frame the essay.
coherence cohesion
The logical structure of the essay is well-organized and easy to follow.
task achievement
Relevant examples, such as mentioning Google and Apple, are provided to support the main points.
task achievement
Ideas are clearly and comprehensively explained, making the argument easy to understand.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: