Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

When talking about
punishments
for crimes, people’s opinions seem to be divergent on a
such
controversial topic. Some people believe that
punishments
should be fixed related to certain types of crimes,
however
, others, take a negative example. I will discuss both views and give my own example as follows. On the one hand, fixed
punishments
for different crimes provide a general framework. The framework helps to judge a criminal fairly without the potential corruption interference conviction process, and it
also
contributes to an effective way of measuring penalties, reducing the cost of discussing repetitively. After all, those two cases present justice toward victims to a large extent and even help to formulate a stable society.
On the other hand
, comprehensively considering all factors may give a more objective judgment to offenders. To be more specific, different scenarios and complicated humanities mixing together create different motivations for a single type of crime,
such
as
self-defense
Change the spelling
self-defence
show examples
against murderers, and manslaughter
while
driving. These two cases could be concluded as a single type of crime, murder, but both of those criminals do not show offensive postures to the victim. If the court evaluates their
punishments
as the same as general murder, it will not execute the justice of innocent people, but demonstrate a miss of objectiveness of the law. It appears to me that fixed
punishments
help to stabilise society
due to
less interference and an effective judging process.
However
, some special cases should be considered comprehensively to make a judgment as fair as possible.
Submitted by yu18526106986 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
The essay addresses the task and discusses both views, but the arguments could be more fully developed. Make sure to provide clear, specific examples for each point to strengthen your arguments.
task achievement
While your ideas are articulated clearly, ensure that your points are elaborated thoroughly. For instance, when discussing the benefits of fixed punishments, you could provide more detailed examples.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a logical structure and includes an introduction and conclusion, but the transitions between ideas could be smoother. Use linking words and phrases to ensure a cohesive flow of ideas.
coherence cohesion
Expand on your supporting points to make your arguments more compelling. For example, provide a detailed scenario where the motivations for a crime significantly alter the outcome.
task achievement
You have successfully introduced the topic and provided a balanced discussion of both views.
coherence cohesion
Your writing is clear and easy to understand. The main points are presented logically.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • fixed punishments
  • consistency
  • predictability
  • deter crime
  • potential offenders
  • streamline
  • judicial process
  • bias
  • corruption
  • complexity
  • human behavior
  • circumstances
  • justice system
  • intent
  • remorse
  • socio-economic background
  • rehabilitate offenders
  • recidivism rates
  • flexible punishment systems
  • inconsistencies
  • perceived injustices
  • public trust
What to do next:
Look at other essays: