In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend lage sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and giver your own opinion
Certain individuals in a number of territories claim that the authorities should spend large amounts of money building new railway lines for swift
trains
between cities. However
, others argue that the governor
should spend this
money on improving current public transportation
. The following essay explains why I wholeheartedly agree with the first statement.
On the one hand, the authority clearly invests in new transportation
technology
as it develops. Rapid trains
also
encourage people to use public transportation
more frequently. In addition
, the old one cost a lot, which is reasonable; the government constructed a new one. For instance
, Japan has constructed new railway lines designed for extremely fast trains
, which have assisted governors in encouraging people to use public transit more frequently instead
of private vehicles. For another example, the construction of new and developed railways in Iran saves the Iranian government money, despite the initial high cost.
On the other hand
, improving the current public transportation
is less expensive than building new ones
. Expanding the current limited public transportation
not only improves assistance but also
reduces costs compared to constructing new ones
. Moreover
, just because the current trains
are slower than the new ones
doesn't mean we should replace them. Technology
advances annually, and if the authority consistently replaces the new trains
, it would incur significant costs for taxpayers. For example
, the governor
of Germany just enhances and develops the current public transit, which costs so little for taxpayers and works so well. For another example, technology
is developed; however
, the governor
of China does not replace the current public transit with new vehicles. However
, the China governor
, when it wants to develop new lines, uses the new technology
.
In conclusion, some individuals argue that governors should invest in public transport to replace it with a faster version. Others, however
, contend that funding for the new ones
should go toward improving the state of public transport.Submitted by mkhdermani on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
relevant specific examples
Incorporate more relevant examples to better illustrate your points. For instance, you might highlight the specific advantages some countries experience with swift trains versus relying solely on current systems.
clear comprehensive ideas
Make sure ideas are fully developed and articulated clearly. Provide more depth when explaining why a particular viewpoint is supported.
complete response
The essay addresses both sides of the argument, clearly presenting your opinion while contrasting it with an opposing view.
logical structure
The essay is well-structured with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.
supported main points
The points in the essay are supported with examples and logical conclusions, reinforcing the arguments made.