Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued that governments should invest in

railways

instead

of

roads

. I completely agree with

this

point of view because

railways

are more environmentally friendly and can

also

be more economical. It is my view that funding

railways

and encouraging

people

to use them more can be highly beneficial.

As a result

of making

railways

more accessible to the public,

people

will be more willing to use them which can lead to a better environment and reduces air pollution.

Moreover

,

railways

are more convenient in congested urban areas where parking is limited and a high number of

cars

on

roads

can result in heavy traffic which can be very annoying to

people

.

In addition

, using

railways

and any other means of public transportation is much cheaper and time-saving than travelling by car.

In contrast

, some

people

claim that governments should emphasize more

roads

as they are better for short trips and

cars

can be safer and more comfortable for

people

. They firmly insist that driving

cars

and travelling on

roads

is more comfortable and public transport is often slow and unreliable.

However

, I do not find

this

argument convincing because nowadays modern public transportation and

railways

are highly standard and governments must ensure that frequent and reliable public transportation is available for each citizen. In conclusion, I completely agree with funding

railways

instead

of

roads

because they can help to reduce pollution in cities and they are

also

much cheaper and faster than

cars

and they would

also

ease traffic congestion.