Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The question of whether

people

control their

lives

or just accept it has become a hotly debated topic nowadays.

While

according to

some

people

Add a comma

people,

show examples

things like lack of finance or work that does not bring satisfaction should be accepted, others claim that

people

should take responsibility for their

lives

and fight the circumstances. On the one hand, blaming and complaining is much easier than tackling the problem. Many

people

choose to look for excuses to keep the job that makes them feel miserable

instead

of looking for another job. No doubt, that sometimes to change something is much harder than to accept.

For example

, I was not satisfied with my previous position in the company, so I took a course to improve my qualifications in order to get a promotion.

Although

learning and working were very hard, it became rewarding in the end.

On the other hand

, when it comes to money, there is never enough. The nature of humans is to ask for more and more, as there is no limit to

wellbeing

Correct your spelling

well-being

show examples

. In

this

case, the wisdom is to accept the reality and find the correct balance between the expectations and real needs.

However

, when a family does not have enough money for food or other basic needs, that shortage of money should definitely be reduced. In my opinion, the angle

people

see the situation depends on their personality, and the way they decide to act depends on their character. Some

people

are fighters and others are not, and everyone makes his or her own decision, and

lives

with the consequences.

To conclude

, I tend to believe that individuals should control their

lives

and prioritise their needs, as some things are important and worth struggling with and others not.