The restoration of old buildings in major cities around the world costs enormous amounts of money. This money would be better spent on providing new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that renovating ancient buildings in major cities worldwide can cost a huge amount of money and that investing in the construction of new houses and developing roads would be more beneficial.

This

essay completely agrees with

this

statement because newly built

homes

can provide housing for

city

residents, and improved roads can facilitate

goods

transportation

.

Firstly

, one of the main reasons I support investments in housing is that it can provide shelter for many people in the

city

. Every person in the

city

needs a home to live in, and the money spent on renovations could be better utilized in constructing new

homes

. A good illustration of

this

is Dubai, which

had

Wrong verb form

has

show examples

many old structures. By constructing new apartments, the

city

was able to provide

homes

for its citizens.

Secondly

, another reason for my agreement is that good road

transportation

helps the export and import industries of cities. The

goods

industry is a significant part of economic growth, and having good means of transport facilitates the efficient supply and import of

goods

, thereby boosting the economic value of the

city

.

For example

, in India, imports and exports between cities increased by 30% after the construction and restoration of highways.

To sum up

, it is clear from the points addressed that it is better to construct new

homes

and improve road

transportation

than to repair damaged buildings. These investments can enhance housing availability in the

city

and improve the

transportation

of

goods

.