The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.

The given bar chart illustrates the data about how much of the produced

waste

is

disposed

Add the preposition

disposed of

show examples

using four different methods in several

cities

including

Toronto

, Madrid,

Kuala

Lumpur

, and

Amman

.

Overall

, what stands out from the graph is that

while

in two

cities

such

as

Toronto

and

Amman

, the garbage is mainly discarded through landfilling, the other two

cities

’ most commonly used approach is incineration. What is more interesting is that if a quick look is taken at all the graphs, it will be elucidated that

although

used to a different extent, all four ways of

waste

removal are ranked

similarly

in

Toronto

and

Amman

.

Moreover

, having the lowest share is a common feature seen regarding compositing among all

cities

. To get a more detailed perspective, it is better to compare each method's usage individually among all

cities

. Regarding landfilling, which

Toronto

seems to be heavily dependent on as it composes about three-quarters of the total

waste

disposal, what is attention-grabbing is that some

cities

like

Kuala

Lumpur

have managed somehow to reduce its utilization to less than 20%.

Moreover

, approximately one-third and a half of Madrid and

Amman

’s disposal is being done through landfilling, respectively. With respect to incineration,

Kuala

Lumpur

is the city that makes the most use of it, and its rate is approximately equal to the sum of

Toronto

's and Madrid’s. In short,

Toronto

and

Kuala

Lumpur

have the highest employment of landfills and incineration, respectively. The remaining two methods of

waste

disposal are not as popular as their counterparts, especially in

Toronto

and

Amman

. What is interesting about recycling is the quite identical rate between Madrid and

Kuala

Lumpur

which is higher by about 14% and 12% than

Toronto

and

Amman

, respectively. Concerning composting, the difference between the first three given countries in the chart is negligible, as they all range from 6% to 9%

percent

Change the spelling

per cent

show examples

.

However

,

Amman

has a considerably lower composting compared to them.