In a number of countries,some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway line for very fast train between cities.others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In a number of countries, there is a debate on whether large sums of money should be allocated to constructing new railway lines for high-speed trains between cities or if it would be better spent on improving existing public
transport
systems
. Both
viewpoints have their merits and drawbacks, which are worth considering in detail.
Proponents of investing in new high-speed railways argue that these projects can significantly boost connectivity between major cities. High-speed trains offer a fast, efficient, and environmentally friendly alternative to car and air travel. For example
, the introduction of high-speed trains in countries like Japan and France has drastically reduced travel times, encouraged economic growth in connected regions, and decreased reliance on fossil fuels. Furthermore
, high-speed rail can stimulate economic development by creating jobs during both
the construction and operational phases. The improved infrastructure can attract businesses and tourism, thereby contributing to the overall
economy. Additionally
, it can help reduce congestion on roads and airports, leading to less traffic and lower emissions.
On the other hand
, those who advocate for spending money on improving existing public transport
systems
argue that it is a more immediate and cost-effective solution. Upgrading current infrastructure can enhance the daily commuting experience for a larger portion of the population. This
includes modernizing buses, subways, and trams, which can make them more reliable, comfortable, and efficient. Investing in current public transport
systems
can also
address pressing issues such
as overcrowding, outdated facilities, and accessibility problems. For instance
, enhancing the frequency and coverage of bus and train services can make public transport
a more viable option for more people, thereby reducing the dependence on private cars and contributing to lower urban congestion and pollution levels.
In my opinion, a balanced approach that incorporates both
viewpoints would be most beneficial. While
high-speed rail projects can offer long-term benefits and transform intercity travel, it is also
crucial to ensure that existing public transport
systems
are not neglected. Governments should aim to allocate funds in a way that supports the development of new high-speed railways where they are most needed and can be most effective, while
also
committing to the ongoing improvement of local public transport
networks. By doing so, it is possible to enhance overall
connectivity, boost economic growth, and promote sustainable transportation solutions. A dual investment strategy would ensure that the immediate needs of urban commuters are met, while
also
preparing for future transportation demands.
In conclusion, while
the construction of new high-speed railway lines has significant advantages, improving existing public transport
systems
is equally important. A combined approach that addresses both
aspects would likely yield the best results for a country's transportation infrastructure.Submitted by tahsin.adam3 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
relevant specific examples
Make sure to incorporate more specific examples or data to strongly substantiate your points. For instance, referring to specific statistics or case studies can provide stronger support for your arguments.
clear comprehensive ideas
While the essay is clear and comprehensive, ensure that you maintain precision in your language to avoid any potential ambiguity. Minor inaccuracies, although not penalizing, should be minimized to enhance clarity.
logical structure
The essay demonstrates a clear and logical structure, with each paragraph contributing to the overall argument effectively.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction and conclusion are well-crafted and do an excellent job of framing and summarizing the discussion.
supported main points
The main points are well-supported and elaborated upon, providing a balanced view of the topic.
Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.
Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.
When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.
Linking words for giving examples:
- for example
- for instance
- to illustrate this
- to give a clear example
- such as
- namely
- to illustrate
- take, for example