Governments should offer a free health care system to their citizens rather than relying on private health care. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

It is often said that providing a free health care system for communities by governments is better than visiting private hospitals for citizens. I entirely agree with

this

view and believe that

this

opinion has come about for several reasons.

To begin

with, there is a developmental increase in universal access

that is

useful and necessary for all residents, including those without economic conditions.

This

is because free medical

services

ensures

Change the verb form

ensure

show examples

all citizens, regardless of income, have access to medical

services

, leading to a healthier population

overall

.

For instance

, the National Health Service (NHS) of the United Kingdom (UK) is a

healthcare

system sponsored by the government, that provides free

healthcare

services

for all UK citizens for the long term. They have a guarantee of approach to good quality medical

services

for people of any class.

Hence

, NHS is considered one of the best medical management in the world

by

Change preposition

because

show examples

significantly

improving

Wrong verb form

improves

show examples

the wellness of many UK residents. There is

also

a good ground for financial protection.

Due to

the high cost of medical examination and treatment, sponsoring expenses by the government can support any part of patients. Granted, it is possible that hospitals cost lots of cash for medical equipment and machinery, but government-funded

healthcare

reduces the financial burden on families, preventing medical bankruptcies and reducing poverty related to

healthcare

costs.

To sum up

,

although

managing the health of all society is impossible, investing a portion of finance in everyone’s medical treatment will be supported and can be promoted in the long term.