Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views.

Whereas
some
people
believe that
companies
should base their hiring process on innovation and independence capabilities, another group believes that the talent search process should be based on
work
and "task-maker" abilities.
This
essay believes that both ideas are acceptable. Depends, mainly, on the type of role that the recruiting
team
is looking for.
For instance
, the first profile is perfect for Senior or Semi-senior
positions
,
however
, the second group fits better with
a
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
data entry and analyst
positions
.
To begin
with, innovation and independence capabilities would be appreciated for senior and semi-senior roles,
therefore
,
companies
should base their searches on these abilities mentioned, for those types of
positions
.
For instance
, strategic
positions
such
as CEO or VP of every company should be filled by innovative
people
,
otherwise
,
companies
could be stuck on an issue where solutions require determination and innovation.
On the other hand
, we have the second group of
people
, who think that the profiles that
companies
need should be oriented to "Task Makers" and
work
team
employees.
This
idea is
also
acceptable,
however
,
this
kind of employee
fit
Correct subject-verb agreement
fits
show examples
much better at data entry and analyst
levels
.
This
is because they execute tasks without worrying about the holistic photo and long-term position of the company. On top of that, these
levels
usually are
compounds
Wrong verb form
compounded
show examples
by many
people
,
therefore
,
work
team
abilities are essential for the role.
For example
,
companies
such
as Accenture and EY possess commercial
teams
Change the noun form
team
show examples
compounds between 10 to 20
people
depending on the client revenue,
therefore
, their participants should be able to
work
in a
team
and
also
perform tasks correctly.
To conclude
,
this
essay believes that both ideas are more than acceptable,
however
, it will depend on the type of role that the recruiting
team
is looking for. As
this
essay mentioned before, for those data-entry and analyst
levels
, task-makers are the best option,
while
for those strategic
levels
, innovative
people
fit better.
Submitted by tomasmutilva99 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
The essay presents clear and comprehensive ideas. However, ensure all components (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion) flow seamlessly. Strengthen transitions between paragraphs for better coherence.
task achievement
Both views are discussed, and the essay provides relevant specific examples. To improve, make sure to maintain clarity and avoid slight repetition.
task achievement
You provided a well-balanced discussion on both views, indicating a strong understanding of the topic.
coherence cohesion
Your essay structure is logical and easy to follow, with introductions and conclusions clearly presented.
task achievement
The use of specific examples effectively supports your arguments, enhancing the clarity and relevance.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • innovative
  • independent
  • creative
  • problem-solving skills
  • development
  • new ideas
  • solutions
  • productivity
  • competitiveness
  • teamwork
  • collaboration
  • communication
  • consistency
  • adherence
  • policies
  • conflicts
  • efficiency
What to do next:
Look at other essays: