Some people think that the government should strictly control the supply of fresh water, while others think we can use as much water as we want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is considerable debate about whether the
government
or individuals should be responsible for the stability of freshwater sources. From my perspective, the authorities have more ability to strictly control the supply of fresh Use synonyms
water
.
The most persuasive stance from proponents is the importance of Use synonyms
water
for human well-being. Use synonyms
Firstly
, the Linking Words
government
can enforce standards to ensure Use synonyms
water
quality and stability, reducing waterborne diseases compared to the higher percentages of contamination from self-storage in unhygienic reservoirs. Use synonyms
Additionally
, with the intervention of the local council, Linking Words
water
can be distributed equitably, especially during drought-prone periods or in arid regions. Use synonyms
For example
, the authorities can plan a suitable regime more efficiently, ensuring citizens have adequate Linking Words
water
for agricultural irrigation, industrial purposes, and daily life. Use synonyms
Lastly
, regulated Linking Words
water
usage helps protect ecosystems, avoids Use synonyms
water
depletion, and maintains ecological balance. Controlled Use synonyms
water
extraction can prevent the drying up of rivers and lakes, thereby preserving habitats for wildlife.
Use synonyms
On the other hand
, the most convincing opinion from opponents highlights the benefits of removing Linking Words
government
regulations related to Use synonyms
water
sources. They argue that stable Use synonyms
water
resources are associated with human well-being, so local communities will be responsible for their demands and use their Use synonyms
water
sources effectively. Local communities might manage Use synonyms
water
resources better than centralized Use synonyms
government
control by tailoring solutions Use synonyms
according to
specific regional characteristics, Linking Words
such
as salination or drought. Linking Words
For instance
, local experts have adapted technology related to wastewater recycling and efficient irrigation methods, which have increased the availability of recycled potable Linking Words
water
. Use synonyms
Furthermore
, opponents argue that individuals should have the freedom to utilize Linking Words
water
responsibly without stringent controls. Use synonyms
Consequently
, Linking Words
this
could contribute to economic growth when individuals can utilize the freshwater necessary without limitations in industries and agriculture, which rely heavily on Linking Words
water
.
Use synonyms
To conclude
, the critical importance of Linking Words
water
for human well-being, equitable distribution, and environmental protection makes a strong case for Use synonyms
government
regulation. The authorities have the ability to enforce standards and create comprehensive plans to ensure sustainable Use synonyms
water
usage, preventing Use synonyms
water
scarcity and maintaining ecological balance. Use synonyms
Nonetheless
, it is essential to recognize the value of local management and personal responsibility in Linking Words
water
usage. Use synonyms
Therefore
, a balanced approach, where the Linking Words
government
regulates the Use synonyms
water
supply Use synonyms
while
encouraging responsible use and local management, appears to be the most effective solution.Linking Words
Submitted by lenam2k1 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Although the essay mentioned some examples, adding more specific examples or case studies could make the argument even stronger. For instance, you could mention specific nations or regions where government regulation of water has been particularly effective or where lack of regulation has led to problems.
coherence cohesion
A smoother transition between points could improve the overall coherence. For example, linking the benefits of government control directly with the drawbacks of individual management can make the argument flow better.
coherence cohesion
The essay is very well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing both views, and a strong conclusion.
task achievement
The essay successfully addresses both perspectives on the issue, providing balanced and comprehensive arguments.
coherence cohesion
Logical development of ideas within paragraphs and between different sections is evident, making the essay easy to follow.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion effectively summarizes the key points and presents a balanced view, suggesting a practical solution.