In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Governments regulate multiple activities for a society to function in harmony. Some individuals contend that the practice of a select few earning significantly larger paychecks is beneficial for the nation.
However
, critics against this
argue that salaries should be regulated by the government and strict laws should be enforced to restrict the money an individual can make. This
essay will highlight both perspectives and argue why, in my opinion, governments should not interfere by controlling incomes. I believe this
deters people
from working hard.
To begin
with, authorities restraining high salaries results in equal distribution of wealth among all citizens. This
promotes peace among societies, as most people
earn enough income to purchase the goods required for survival, resulting in a significant drop in crimes. For instance
, in communist states like North Korea, all people
are paid equally despite their educational qualifications. As a result
, the proportion of people
who commit crimes here is merely 1%. This
seems to demonstrate that similar compensation in a society can effectively mitigate high crime rates.
However
, such
stringent regulation can impede people
who put in large amounts of effort into their careers. If these people
are not adequately compensated, they will lose their motivation to aim high. Consequently
, jobs that require advanced training courses as well as
hectic working hours will not be filled, due to
unfair compensation. To illustrate, medical professionals often work more than 100 hours per week. If they are provided with the same salary as a teacher, who works half days and enjoys three months of summer vacation, they will quit their jobs. This
will be detrimental to the country’s healthcare infrastructure. Thus
, I firmly contend that such
laws are more disadvantageous for a nation.
In conclusion, I reiterate that distributing the money equitably among all people
, irrespective of the job qualifications required and working conditions is wrong. People
should be allowed to earn high incomes based on their education and how much effort they are willing to put into their careers.Submitted by Writing8
on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While the essay addresses both views and provides a clear opinion, it could benefit from a more balanced discussion. Ensure equal emphasis on both sides of the argument to achieve a balanced perspective.
coherence cohesion
Improve the coherence by using clearer transitions between points. Signposting language would make the essay more readable and logically structured.
task achievement
While examples are relevant, providing a wider range of examples from different contexts could strengthen the argument.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction is well-structured, presenting the topic and giving a clear opinion.
supported main points
The essay effectively uses examples to support the arguments presented.
clear comprehensive ideas
The main points are clear and directly address the task prompt.