Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative one? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fromyour own knowledge or experience.

The use of gadgets is prohibited in some schools. I believe it is a well-developed position from school authorities

due to

productivity

during classes and the total focus of

students

. To commence, the restriction of devices may lead to the upgrade of

productivity

among

students

.

That is

to say, since there are no phones or any other gadgets, it is likely to seem that

students

might get engaged more than they used to.

This

is

due to

the fact that they would have got involved in teacher-led lessons enthusiastically and enhanced their cognitive abilities. To illustrate, in Kazakhstan, there are specialized schools for gifted juveniles in which vice principals established a rule of not using a phone during classes.

This

was

due to

low

productivity

of

students

and failure in exams;

as a result

of excessive utilisation of gadgets, and playing video games.

Finally

, after a

while

of time, heads estimated the proficiency of

students

, attending classes resulting in the enhancement of

curriculum

Correct article usage

the curriculum

show examples

and maturity of

students

.

That is

why I think, it can promote only positive outcomes rather than negative as I can not see any drawback of

this

new rule at schools.

Conversely

,

this

can develop independence from phones and full success in academic fields. In conclusion, prohibited phones might result in a good result in the

productivity

of

students

, either focus on disciplines or succeed

easily

Correct quantifier usage

more easily

show examples

than their peers