Hosting an international sporting event such as the Olympic Games is good for the country, regardless of the potential negatives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

International athletic competitions,

such

as the

Olympics

, are beneficial to the nation, even with any potential drawbacks. I concur that it will support the growth of travel within the nation.

However

, I agree that the money set aside for the

Olympics

will do more harm than good.      

To begin

with, hosting international sports events is beneficial for the

state

's tourism. Spectators who visit a

country

to watch the Olympic Games will certainly spend a certain amount of money in that

country

.

This

will benefit the

state

in the field of tourism. and makes the name of the host

country

famous.    

Secondly

, the profit from hosting is usually used to cover the loss. There will be a loss to the Treasury but no profit. Because of the

Olympics

, a large amount of money is allocated by the

state

for a stadium or other type of construction. After the

Olympics

, not all of its parts will return to the

state

.

This

is because the building was expensive and large.

Therefore

, the building is not used much.   In conclusion, hosting international sporting events

such

as the

Olympics

,

while

developing the

country

on the one hand, does more harm than good.