Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The world was created by God to make life sophisticated for all human beings. There are a few people who believe that the

solution

to environmental issues must be resolved globally. But other communities think it is nice to solve within the

Nation

. I strongly support that the community-side

solution

is impractical to save the world,

therefore

implementing it at the global level is always the right decision. Working on the correction in a small community always easy to drive the conclusion. Whenever there is a problem in the

Nation

, it is easy to find the

solution

because the decision committee members are fewer and spontaneous implementation is possible.

For example

, the Social Security law is implemented in India in a shorter period

due to

the involvement of a few people in the committee.

Additionally

, the cause of the

solution

needs to be monitored to work on the amendment. Since the

nation

is a small level, it is not a difficult take to implement a workaround when there is a threat.

Therefore

, environmental solutions are handled by the

nation

is always appropriate. In conclusion, both global and individual approaches are necessary to address environmental problems effectively. Global cooperation can lead to the sharing of knowledge and resources,

while

individual countries can implement solutions tailored to their specific needs. By working together, we can ensure a sustainable future for ourselves and future generations.