Nowadays it is possible to use computers and mobile phones for automatic language translation, and there is no need for human translators and interpreters. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In these times, technology has been more advanced as compared to the

last

two to ten years.

Along with

these developments, there were many changes done to the technology and

one

of these things is automatic speech translation. The introduction of

this

specific feature caused problems for those who worked as manual interpreters. As of today, I completely agree with

this

view because it's hard to find a translator nowadays. With the introduction of an automatic system, we can use

this

function through mobile phones or other gadgets and it is easy to carry around wherever we go rather than calling a person who is not at the site to translate. An example of

this

is Google provides more than 20 language translation features to the users which help them to access various languages used around the globe.

Whereas

, it is difficult for an individual to mediate for speech more than 5 or 6. So in

this

way, an automatic speech recognizer is way too better than a manual

one

. Many students are going to another country to get their master's or other purposes and

one

of the reasons they will find more difficulty is a language problem and with the help of

this

, it can be really helpful to them. In conclusion, I would say that,

one

of the best developments made by mankind.