The map below is of the town of canterbury. A new school (s) is planned for the area. the map shows two possible sites for the school. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The map below is of the town of canterbury. A new school (s) is planned for the area. the map shows two possible sites for the school. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map of Canterbury presents two proposed sites for a new
school
:
Site
1 (S1) and
Site
2 (S2). Each
site
offers distinct advantages and challenges that need to be evaluated for the optimal placement of the new educational facility.
Site
1 (S1) is positioned to the northeast of Canterbury, situated within a countryside area.
This
site
is approximately 5
kilometers
Change the spelling
kilometres
show examples
from the nearby
town
of Sturry, which has a population of 7,000, potentially providing a significant number of students. The
site
is
also
adjacent to a main road, ensuring good connectivity for students and staff
traveling
Change the spelling
travelling
show examples
from surrounding areas by car or bus.
In contrast
,
Site
2 (S2) is located in the
town
center
Change the spelling
centre
show examples
, which is a designated no-traffic zone.
This
central location is in close proximity to residential areas and the existing university, fostering strong integration with the local
community
and higher education institutions. The
town
center
Change the spelling
centre
show examples
provides various amenities that could benefit students and parents, contributing to a more convenient and engaging
school
environment
. From a logistical perspective,
Site
1’s accessibility via main roads makes it convenient for commuting, though its rural setting may appeal to those preferring a more serene
environment
.
Conversely
,
Site
2’s position in the no-traffic zone might limit vehicle access, yet it is highly accessible on foot and through public transportation. The proximity to housing and the university could enhance
community
interaction and resource sharing, creating a vibrant educational atmosphere. Environmentally,
Site
1 offers a peaceful countryside setting conducive to outdoor activities and a quieter academic
environment
.
Site
2, embedded in the dynamic
town
center
Change the spelling
centre
show examples
, benefits from the existing infrastructure and the vibrant urban setting, which could provide diverse learning opportunities and extracurricular activities. In summary, both sites have unique attributes that could influence the development and success of the new
school
.
Site
1 offers a spacious and tranquil
environment
with excellent road access, ideal for a traditional
school
setup.
In contrast
,
Site
2 provides an integrated urban setting with rich amenities and strong
community
ties, suitable for a modern, collaborative educational approach. The final decision will hinge on balancing these factors with the
school
’s educational goals and the
community
's needs.
Submitted by shakhzod0905 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Linking words: Don't use the same linking words: "in contrast".
Conclusion: The conclusion is too long.
Basic structure: Use less body paragraphs.
Common mistake: Your writing should be 150-250 words.
Basic structure: Change the fourth paragraph.
Vocabulary: Replace the words school, site, town, community, environment with synonyms.
Vocabulary: Only 6 basic words for charts were used.
Vocabulary: The word "provides" was used 3 times.
Vocabulary: Use several vocabularies to present the data in the fourth paragraph.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: