Some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend the money for housing and road development. To what extent do you agree?
Whether governments allocate funds to rebuilding old buildings has been an issue open to debate.
While
some contend that the investment should be prohibited, and reallocated to other amenities such
as public transportation; I argue that it is necessary for officials not only to focus on the repairment of old places but also
on allocation to basic amenities.
On the one hand, old buildings often have historical and architectural value, reflecting a city's cultural heritage. The tremendous amounts of financial support by authorities renders a boom of historical culture and stimulates folks' enthusiasm for heritage. These facts, in turn, contribute to a wide range of educational opportunities and boost the tourism industry. Furthermore
, restoring aged constructions such
as museums and ruins creates a host of employment involving draft designers, electricians, construction workers and publicists, which can boost local economies. For example
, the reestablishment of the Great Wall in China, reappears the prosperity of ancient China, attracting substantial Chinese citizens and foreigners to appreciate in person, which is more sustainable than new-built constructions.
On the other hand
, given the happiness of residents' lives typically relating to infrastructures, governments are obliged to lay out a fortune on them. Appropriate and complete basic facilities such
as an efficient drainage system, power grid and water supply are essential for improving quality of life, increasing safe levels in severe weather, and maintaining society stability. For instance
, New Zealand has a thorough and comprehensive social welfare like a free medical system and subsidy for retirement, leading to low rates of immigration and crime. In addition
, the complete infrastructure facilities like the traffic supporting project can appeal to investments from foreign areas for low logistics cost, raising the values of cities and promoting the
economic development .
Correct article usage
apply
To sum up
, governments and husbandmen can benefit a lot through spending on both old buildings and basic amenities. On balance, I am convinced that officials should focus on infrastructures, while
need to be aware of the necessity of restoration of heritages involved.Submitted by xeyojnn on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
The essay provides a well-rounded and complete response to the task, addressing both sides of the argument. To score higher, ensure every paragraph directly supports the thesis statement without digressing. The introduction and conclusion could be made slightly more compelling by restating the thesis in a more impactful manner.
coherence cohesion
Make sure to use a clear and logical structure throughout the essay. Each paragraph should start with a clear topic sentence that guides the reader. Additionally, use more varied transition words between paragraphs and ideas to create a smoother flow.
task achievement
Although the essay presents relevant examples, strive to use more specific data or case studies to substantiate your points. Avoid generalizations and ensure each example directly supports your main argument.
task achievement
You did a great job of presenting balanced perspectives on government spending and gave solid examples to support your points.
coherence cohesion
Your essay exhibits a good logical structure with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, which helps in guiding the reader through your argument.
supports main points
The arguments are well-supported with relevant examples and demonstrate a thoughtful understanding of the topic.