The table below presents the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 avout one university. Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table below presents the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 avout one university.

Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table below
dislays
Correct your spelling
displays
a
Correct article usage
the
show examples
number of students who got good grades for different aspects between 2000 and 2010 with an interval of 5 years. As we can see, in 2000,
majority
Correct article usage
the majority
show examples
of learners showed great results in
print
resources
and building/teaching
facilities
with
the
Correct article usage
a
show examples
percentage of 87 and 77.
However
, students showed pretty bad
score
Fix the agreement mistake
scores
show examples
in the aspects of technical
quality
, electronic
resources
and most importantly,
range
Correct article usage
the range
show examples
of modules offered with the corresponding
rate
Fix the agreement mistake
rates
show examples
of 65, 45 and a whopping 32. As the time passed, in 2005, many subjects' ratings didn't change that much. Technical
quality
and
range
of modules offered got slightly lower by 2%,
print
resources
, being the highest one, got
minor
Correct article usage
a minor
show examples
increase
also
by 2%,
while
building/teaching
facilities
grades stayed the same. All of them, except for one.
Aspect
Add an article
The aspect
An aspect
show examples
of electronic
resources
' results skyrocketed by 27%.
However
, after another 5 years,
print
resources
and electronic
resources
showed amazing rates of 88%. Building/teaching
facilities
surprisingly stayed with the same score of 77%. Technical
quality
also
slightly increased by 6%. And the lowest out of all was
range
Add an article
a range
the range
show examples
of modules offered with 27%.
Overall
, in a decade,
aspect
Correct article usage
the aspect
show examples
of building/teaching
facilities
was consistently staying at 77%.
Print
resources
was
Change the verb form
were
show examples
still the highest one out of all, tieing with electronic
resources
.
Whereas
technical
quality
and
range
of models offered didn't illustrate impressive results with
the
Correct article usage
a
show examples
percentage of 69 and 27.
Submitted by akzharkynzhamal on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Sentences: Add more complex sentences.
Linking words: Don't use the same linking words: "also, however".
Introduction: The introduction is missing.
Introduction: Change the first sentence in the introduction.
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
Vocabulary: Replace the words print, resources, facilities, quality, range with synonyms.
Vocabulary: The word "showed" was used 3 times.
Vocabulary: The word "percentage" was used 2 times.
Vocabulary: The word "increase" was used 2 times.
Vocabulary: The word "stayed" was used 2 times.
Vocabulary: The word "slightly" was used 2 times.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • survey results
  • teaching quality
  • facilities
  • student satisfaction
  • support services
  • trends
  • ratings
  • infrastructure
  • utilization rates
  • feedback
  • university policies
  • available services
  • evolution
  • main features
  • comparisons
  • relevant
  • analyzing
  • overview
  • discussing
  • exploring
  • examining
What to do next:
Look at other essays: