The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is believed that
science
is for the sake of human convenience. It should be used as a tool to increase the quality
of people
's lives
. However
, the development of science
may not always be compatible with a better life
for everyone. War and weapons can be a good indication of the devastating effects
of improvement in science
. In my opinion, science
should be only in favour of better lives
and such
impacts might be controlled or avoided.
First of all, thanks to science
, people
's life
quality
has appreciated
substantially. It might be impossible for almost everyone to imagine the world without all Verb problem
increased
this
progressions
. Replace the word
progress
For example
, the development in agricultural equipment and methods has caused a rise in the amount of food production and made the food available for the increasing population of the world. Another example might be the technology. Basically, people
rely on technology so heavily that a day without it might turn out tobe
Correct your spelling
to be
Correct article usage
an anightmare
anightmare
. One reason for Correct your spelling
a nightmare
nightmare
that is
the extent to which it made everything easier, we do not have to go to the banks anymore and squander our precious time in crowded rows for opening a bank account or paying a bill. We also
get to purchase our needed items online in less than a minute. So, the improvement of science
in agriculture and technology are two great examples of how science
can lead us to a better and easier life
.
On the other hand
, the catastrophic effects
of science
should not be ignored. It can be a double-edged sword and the impacts may not be compatible with a better quality
of human life
. Governments may spend a lot of money on manufacturing new and powerful weapons to extend their territories and put the lives
of many poeples
at risk. In Correct your spelling
peoples
people
this
case not only the
development of Add a missing verb
does the
science
not result in life
improvement, but also
it will cause many problems instead
. Thus
, I believe that the main purpose of science
might be to increase the life
quality
, and such
devastating effects
should be eliminated.
In conclusion, Science
can have both negative and positive effects
on people
's lives
, it is important to be aware of the negative ones and try to work toward the ones that lead to a better life
.Submitted by TUTOO on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
To improve the coherence and cohesion of your essay, try to ensure that all parts of your paragraphs are clearly related to the main point. You may want to use more transitional phrases to connect your ideas effectively.
task achievement
Your essay would benefit from more specific and detailed examples. While your examples related to agriculture and technology are good, more depth and specificity would make your arguments stronger.
general
Be mindful of minor grammatical errors and typos such as 'progressions' instead of 'progress,' 'tobe anightmare' instead of 'to be a nightmare,' and 'poeples' instead of 'people.' Correcting these would make your writing clearer.
task achievement
You have effectively covered both sides of the argument, which makes your discussion balanced and comprehensive.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion are clear and encapsulate the main points of the essay effectively.
coherence cohesion
Your essay follows a logical structure, with clear paragraphing and development of ideas.