University students should pay the full cost of their studies because university education benefits individuals rather than society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, many learners attempt to be granted a scholarship. some people,

however

, hold the opinion that they should pay for their own education because studying benefits them

instead

of the

nations

Fix the agreement mistake

nation

show examples

. It seems to me that

this

is not the case, and I will explain why in

this

essay.

Firstly

, it is undeniable that most families do not have adequate savings to register their children in proper colleges.

This

might contribute to wasting a lot of potential which are in

such

students.

Therefore

, science being in the service of human would not take advantage of their intellectual abilities. A telling example is a renowned scholar named Albert Einstein, his dedication to scientific discoveries is well-known. Based on his biography, he was from a deprived family.

Therefore

, if governments had not assisted him, he would have not been able to attain

such

knowledge to play his role for humanity.

Secondly

, in

this

case, only affluent ones could enter educational institutions converting them into sumptuous items.

Consequently

, they might lose their main purpose which is thriving general knowledge. Admittedly, I agree with those who believe academic studies might be prolific for learners' future, but we should consider that

this

is the individuals that make the society.

However

, governments investing in every person does not make a scene, and they should prevent wasting a country's assets by placing an entrance exam for colleges so only ones that have potential enter

such

places.

To conclude

,

this

is not to say that only societies benefit from free education, but it seems reasonable for governments to support those who want to study and attain the knowledge to help science.

Nevertheless

, having basic intellectual abilities must be a criterion.