*The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.* *To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement*
The very crucial concern of
science
should be to develop the lives of people
. Science
should necessarily make people
's lives easier. It's indispensable for science
to discover more ways that can help humans do their work. There is a huge extension in behalf of positive growth but also
there are some drawbacks that concur with this
statement. Let's go on to elucidate both aspects.
First of all, it's true that science
is helping people
to do most of their tasks in daily life
. Science
has discovered a range of inventions from the past to now. When we see the inventions of science
, it only exhibits the development of life
. For example
, when we go to see the past there is no basic facility that can be seen. People
lived in the caves, forests and tribe's
for the safety of their lives. They did not even the safe food to eat. In short, Change the noun form
tribes
tribe
life
was very hard before science
. Now people
are living a very comfortable life
and enjoying many inventories of science
. This
aspect of science
enables me to agree that science
should play a substantial role in improving life
.
As there
are Correct word choice
There
also
some negative aspects to agree with this
statement because people
are becoming lazy and dull day by day due to
some inventions of science
. This
means that science
has discovered enough ways to help people
stay free. For instance
, the discovery of robots has made people
pay less attention to their work. There are also
some machines that replace people
for work purposes.
In conclusion, it's not a lie to say that the most important object of science
should be to upgrade the living system but this
statement is true only for certain limits.Submitted by mianraza686 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, but the development of ideas in the body paragraphs needs more clarity and coherence. Ensure that each paragraph has a clear main point and that the ideas flow logically from one to the next.
task achievement
The essay addresses the prompt adequately but lacks depth in some arguments. Make sure to fully explore both sides of the argument and provide more detailed examples and explanations to support your points.
task achievement
Avoid vague statements and ensure that each point is specific and supported by detailed examples. This will help in making your arguments more compelling and clear.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, which frames the argument well.
task achievement
The essay attempts to address both positive and negative aspects of science in relation to the prompt.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?