Science is more useful than human judgement in stopping crime. To what extent do you agree?
Some individuals believe that
Science
is more beneficial than human judgment in criminal cases
. I partly agree with that because If there is DNA
evidence
science
may solve the whole crime
. However
, sometimes there is no evidence
and we should trust the Judge's decision.
Science
might be beneficial for stopping crimes. It provides us real
Change preposition
with real
proof
of that crime
case. For instance
, If there is no evidence
such
as a video record or some witness and also
we just have a
hair of somebody. When they check the Correct article usage
the
DNA
of hair, they may find the criminal with just a hair. However
, If we find two different hairs in a crime
area and we know that there is one criminal, scientific checks cannot be helpful for us because we have to ask both of these suspects. Hence
, Science
can be beneficial If there is evidence
with DNA
checks. Nevertheless
, If we have two or more proof
it cannot solve the whole crime
.
On the other hand
, Sometimes we need human judgment in cases
. If there are some problems such
as lack
of Correct article usage
a lack
evidence
or lack of witnesses. Somebody has to ask suspects some psychological questions
to solve a crime
.For example
, Recently ın my neighborhood there was a case of robbery. However
, It happened at night and nobody saw the criminal. They have two or three suspects and they have to ask them questions
such
as where were you at that time. In the end, some suspect
gave up and explained the whole robbery and he was punished with 3 years. Fix the agreement mistake
suspects
Therefore
, If we do not have proof
to solve a crime
human judgement might be useful for these cases
.
To sum up
, Some people believe that Science
is more useful than human judgement
Correct your spelling
judgment
to
solving and Change preposition
in
also
stopping criminal cases
. I partly agree with that because In
my opinion, it depends on the Add the comma(s)
, In
evidence
. If we have enough evidence
to find out the criminal from his/her DNA
, Science
may solve the whole case by itself. However
, Sometimes we do not have enough proof
to solve these cases
by Science
, At that time human judgement will solve these cases
by asking suspects some psychological questions
. suspects some psyhclogical
Correct your spelling
psychological
questions
.Submitted by taylanpolat6124 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
To improve the logical structure, aim to organize your essay into clearer paragraphs with distinct main points. Currently, the ideas are somewhat scattered.
coherence cohesion
Creating a more impactful introduction and conclusion will help support your main argument. Both should clearly restate your position in a simple manner at the beginning and end.
task achievement
Work on elaborating your points with more detail and using varied vocabulary to make the essay more engaging.
task achievement
Use specific and relevant examples throughout your essay to add depth and support to your argument.
task achievement
The essay presents a clear central argument with both sides considered, demonstrating a balanced view.
task achievement
The essay mentions relevant examples, like DNA evidence and the robbery case, which add to the clarity of the argument.