Science is more useful than human judgement in stopping crime. To what extent do you agree?

Some individuals believe that
Science
is more beneficial than human judgment in criminal
cases
. I partly agree with that because If there is
DNA
evidence
science
may solve the whole
crime
.
However
, sometimes there is no
evidence
and we should trust the Judge's decision.
Science
might be beneficial for stopping crimes. It provides us
real
Change preposition
with real
show examples
proof
of that
crime
case.
For instance
, If there is no
evidence
such
as a video record or some witness and
also
we just have
a
Correct article usage
the
show examples
hair of somebody. When they check the
DNA
of hair, they may find the criminal with just a hair.
However
, If we find two different hairs in a
crime
area and we know that there is one criminal, scientific checks cannot be helpful for us because we have to ask both of these suspects.
Hence
,
Science
can be beneficial If there is
evidence
with
DNA
checks.
Nevertheless
, If we have two or more
proof
it cannot solve the whole
crime
.
On the other hand
, Sometimes we need human judgment in
cases
. If there are some problems
such
as
lack
Correct article usage
a lack
show examples
of
evidence
or lack of witnesses. Somebody has to ask suspects some psychological
questions
to solve a
crime
.
For example
, Recently ın my neighborhood there was a case of robbery.
However
, It happened at night and nobody saw the criminal. They have two or three suspects and they have to ask them
questions
such
as where were you at that time. In the end, some
suspect
Fix the agreement mistake
suspects
show examples
gave up and explained the whole robbery and he was punished with 3 years.
Therefore
, If we do not have
proof
to solve a
crime
human judgement might be useful for these
cases
.
To sum up
, Some people believe that
Science
is more useful than human
judgement
Correct your spelling
judgment
show examples
to
Change preposition
in
show examples
solving and
also
stopping criminal
cases
. I partly agree with that because
In
Add the comma(s)
, In
show examples
my opinion, it depends on the
evidence
. If we have enough
evidence
to find out the criminal from his/her
DNA
,
Science
may solve the whole case by itself.
However
, Sometimes we do not have enough
proof
to solve these
cases
by
Science
, At that time human judgement will solve these
cases
by asking suspects some psychological
questions
. suspects some
psyhclogical
Correct your spelling
psychological
questions
.
Submitted by taylanpolat6124 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
To improve the logical structure, aim to organize your essay into clearer paragraphs with distinct main points. Currently, the ideas are somewhat scattered.
coherence cohesion
Creating a more impactful introduction and conclusion will help support your main argument. Both should clearly restate your position in a simple manner at the beginning and end.
task achievement
Work on elaborating your points with more detail and using varied vocabulary to make the essay more engaging.
task achievement
Use specific and relevant examples throughout your essay to add depth and support to your argument.
task achievement
The essay presents a clear central argument with both sides considered, demonstrating a balanced view.
task achievement
The essay mentions relevant examples, like DNA evidence and the robbery case, which add to the clarity of the argument.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: