Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only those subjects that they find interesting and they are best at. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

One school of thought holds that teenagers should have a balanced approach towards all

subjects

,

while

others are of the opinion that they should make decisions depending on their interests and abilities.

This

essay will analyse both viewpoints before concluding that I lean towards the latter. Admittedly, there are compelling reasons for the belief that a wide range of

subjects

should be equally focused by

students

. Proponents of

this

may argue that learning all

subjects

will inexorably equip teenagers with a well-rounded knowledge. Geography,

for example

, not only does it require

students

to memorise theories, but

also

demands practical skills,

such

as using maps and data analysis.

Thus

,

this

fundamental knowledge will help them in approaching

further

topics,

such

as geo-political Politics.

However

, it is vital to recognise that acquiring all

subjects

could make it arduous for

students

to discern their strengths and select an appropriate major for university.

This

spells trouble for an imbalance among various academic curriculums nationwide, leading to an insufficiency in the labour market for some particular industries or graduates working in unrelated fields to their studies. Considering the aforementioned arguments, I align with those advocating for prioritising

subjects

that they excel at and enjoy. Studying

subjects

that they master could bring about higher performance and grades throughout their learning journeys

due to

a high level of engagement in certain

subjects

.

Consequently

, teenagers could decide their pursuit of disciplines in university at an early stage, optimising their learning experience with either specialised theory or practical skills.

Furthermore

, specialised learning will provide them with essential and appropriate skills for their careers to adapt quickly to the working environment, compared to generalised

students

, who might take it longer.

Additionally

, some are born with an innate aptitude for music or art.

This

means that they should be taught using instruments or paintings, rather than focusing on

subjects

such

as Physics or Biology, which appeared to be less appealing to them and could be a waste of time

on

Change preposition

in

show examples

an inefficient learning process. The distribution of different specialising in studying will

therefore

be conducive to diversity in the job market,

as well as

reducing the chances of doing inappropriate work in the future. In conclusion,

although

broadening knowledge by studying an array of

subjects

is essential for young people, I am more convinced that the long-term benefits of specialising in studies on both individual and national scales are more justifiable.