The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005, with estimated figures for 2015.
The chart depicts the proportion of land occupied by trees in different nations from 1990 to 2005 and the close figures for 2015.
Overall
, it is clear that
Australia and Brazil had a significant drop in the ratio throughout the time, and Chile,
and New Zealand went upward throughout the period by adding more forest on land.
Remove the comma
apply
To begin
with, in 1990 Australia was the 3rd least country having land captured by wood, after two and half decades the country secured 4th place with a decrement of 1.9% and stood at 20% in 2015. On the other hand
, Brazil had a very significant ratio of shore-land, compared to woodland but, by that time, it showed a very drastic change by having the biggest fall of 8.7% (53.5%) in 2015.
In addition
, In 1990 New Zealandwas
, Correct your spelling
Zealand was
2ndthe
2nd the top country in which 28.8 of Correct your spelling
2nd the
shore
area was taken by the jungle, and Correct article usage
the shore
this
went more gradually upwards with a ratio of around 4.5% (32.3). Likewise
, Chile had a very numerical soar of a
nearly 1.4% and stood at 22%.Correct article usage
apply
Submitted by tushalk329 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Vocabulary: The word "ratio" was used 3 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "stood" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "significant" was used 2 times.
▼