Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years that many cities in the world are now one “big traffic jam”. More people should use public transport. Do you agree or disagree?
Over the past three decades, the surge in car ownership has turned many
cities
into congested areas with daily traffic
jams. It is common knowledge that urban centers
worldwide face severe transportation challenges Change the spelling
centres
due to
the overwhelming number of vehicles. I am inclined to agree that more people should be persuaded to use public transport
to address these issues, as this
would benefit both the flow of traffic
and the environment.
The main reason to support public transport
is its potential to significantly reduce traffic
congestion. This
means that if more people choose buses, trains, or trams, there will be fewer cars on the road, improving overall
traffic
flow. For instance
, cities
like Tokyo and London have successfully minimized traffic
jams by offering a wide range of public transport
services, persuading residents to leave their cars at home.
Moreover
, encouraging public transport
usage can have substantial positive environmental effects. In other words
, reducing the number of private vehicles on the roads can decrease air pollution, which is often exaggerated by car emissions. As a result
, cities
can become healthier places with cleaner air and fewer health issues. Additionally
, public transport
networks often portray a more sustainable image, which can persuade more people to be involved with these systems.
In conclusion, the surge in car ownership has undoubtedly worsened traffic
problems in cities
across the world. Therefore
, I strongly agree that promoting public transport
is essential to resolving these issues. By reducing traffic
congestion and improving environmental conditions, public transportation can create more livable urban environments for everyone.Submitted by eparfenenkov on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
supported main points
Support main points with additional examples. Although the current examples are relevant, providing a broader range of examples could strengthen the argument. For instance, mentioning how other cities have successfully implemented public transport policies would add depth.
relevant specific examples
Expand on the reasoning for the environmental benefits. While the essay touches on pollution reduction, elaborating on specific pollutants reduced or health benefits would add more comprehensive depth to the argument.
logical structure
The essay has a clear and structured logical structure, with a well-defined introduction and conclusion.
clear comprehensive ideas
Ideas are clearly presented and comprehensible, making the essay enjoyable to read.