Some people believe that charity organisations should help people wherever they live, others think they should help people in their country only. Discuss both views, give your opinion.
People have different opinions on whether charitable institutions should serve those in need globally.
While
some argue that these groups are supposed to only offer help to residents in their own nations, I contend that nationality should not be the criterion when it comes to providing aid.
To begin
with, one argument in favour of non-profit institutions focusing solely on their own countries is that the majority of these entities are normally funded by governments, meaning that it is the local population who contribute through taxes rather than individuals from abroad. Therefore
, these groups should primarily support their own citizens instead
of assisting those from other regions. Another key reason for this
perspective is that some nations, especially impoverished ones, face serious societal problems, such
as famine. As a result
, aid organisations in these areas should concentrate their efforts on helping those within their borders who suffer from severe conditions. If they allocate their resources to assist others from different places, those in need at home may be neglected.
However
, even if these notions are understandable in certain ways, I maintain that non-profits should treat everyone equally, regardless of nationality, for two major reasons. Firstly
, all lives are of equal value; we have no right to determine whether saving one person is more important than another. Additionally
, in a globalized era, every nation is interconnected. If a country, including its domestic aid groups, focuses solely on its own needs, it may become isolated from the rest of the global community. Consequently
, when it faces challenges that it cannot handle alone, such
as natural disasters, it may find itself without international support due to
its past self-centeredness. Conversely
, those nations that have fostered goodwill, such
as China, are more likely to receive assistance in extreme situations. For example
, China received help from around the globe when it faced an earthquake in 2008.
In conclusion, whether from an individual or national perspective, I believe that charities need to offer the same access to everyone worldwide; nationality should not be the criterion when offering assistance.Submitted by 645119931 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
While your essay is logically organized, ensure each paragraph transitions fluidly from one idea to the next. This can be achieved by using a wider variety of linking words and phrases.
task achievement
You've fully addressed the task prompt and provided a comprehensive response. However, consider deepening your analysis further by exploring the potential counterarguments briefly.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion are clear and effectively frame your argument.
task achievement
Your examples, especially the one regarding China, add significant weight to your argument and demonstrate relevance and specificity.
Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+
Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!