Some people believe that the arts should receive money from government and big companies. Others feel such spending is a luxury and that it would be better if it were invested in scientific projects. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Provide reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Government and known companies always have spent their cash on several aspects

such

as arts and technology. Many people believe that spending change on exhibitions and art is wasting wealth

thus

most part of the investment has to be for scientific projects.

First,

if investigators gave their money just for art, their country would not see any pioneers

which

Correct pronoun usage

who

show examples

are related to science.

Therefore

, the government have to buy the newest technology and investigations from other nations

then

it will cost more than their budget.

On the other hand

, arts are very important to show the culture of a country like France. Paris, has many art museums and their huge companies spend a lot of budget on

this

industry

hence

, they attract many artists and tourists from all around the world

hence

they receive a lot of currency.

Second,

scientific research is really important for pioneer countries. It is one of the best ways of getting funds from other investors. If these scientific projects are followed by all people

then

it is obvious they can bring more than a billion dollars to their regions. Logically, it is visible that similar countries like South Korea and Japan are the pioneers and have the highest technology. Obviously, they had become one of the richest countries on earth by emphasizing on newest science subjects. In conclusion, spending wealth on any industry is very good.

in contrast

, people have to know how to make money by each of them.

Due to

the examples, we can understand investing cash in any aspect can make a country rich and popular in its domain.