Some people think that the goverment should strictly control the supply of fresh water, as it is a limited resource , while others it should not be regulated. Discuss both the sides and give your opinion

Since time immemorial,
water
has been an indispensable part of human life. There is,
however
, a controversy among community members on whether the government should restrict the usage of freshwater or not. I find myself in strong agreement with those who hold the idea of restriction. On the one hand, the proponents of passing strict regulations contend that the majority of territories are suffering from
water
deficit
Fix the agreement mistake
deficits
show examples
.
For instance
, My country, Iran, has been hit by draught so hard and
therefore
, the aquatic
resources
have been on the decline.
Thus
, It is for the government to shoulder the burden of protecting these valuable
resources
otherwise
, residents and industry sections may encounter tremendous vexations in their affairs. I tend to have a robust stance in favour of the mentioned approach. I think that
water
tables
would
Wrong verb form
will
show examples
lose their contents unless the government takes some steps to protect them. To illustrate, the authorities should legislate laws to prohibit industries from disposing of their waste that percolates into
water
tables conducive to
water
contamination,
otherwise
, they would be imposed penalties.
As a result
, aquatic
resources
would be accessible for future generations.
On the other hand
, opponents of the mentioned laws opine that it is one of the basic needs of human beings to consume fresh
water
based on their demand without limitations.
Moreover
, some nations
such
as Europeans that are provided with sufficient rainfall may have less inclination toward restrictive approaches as they opine that the used aquatic sources will be compensated by the ecosystem.
However
, I refute them as neglecting the existing
resources
may lead to their decline and pollution leading to a disaster. In conclusion, it seems rational to accept that the more the officials of society account for
water
reserves, the more virtues may be brought about, it may go in a negative parallel with some,
nevertheless
.
Submitted by samirakasraee72 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
In the introduction, consider briefly mentioning both views to provide a balanced overview before stating your opinion for better clarity.
coherence cohesion
Enhance the conclusion by summarizing the main points discussed in the essay along with reinforcing your opinion to leave a stronger impact.
task achievement
Include more specific examples or data where possible to back up the arguments for an even stronger task achievement.
coherence cohesion
The essay is logically structured with clear paragraphs addressing each side of the argument, making it easy for the reader to follow.
task achievement
There is a good balance of discussing both sides of the argument, presenting a clear stance and justification for your opinion.
coherence cohesion
The essay uses a range of vocabulary and complex sentence structures effectively, demonstrating a strong command of the language.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • limited resource
  • strictly control
  • government regulation
  • manage
  • allocate
  • responsibly
  • sustainable
  • water scarcity
  • water conservation
  • equitable distribution
What to do next:
Look at other essays: