Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective.

It

true

Add a missing verb

is true

show examples

that we are living in an era with the indispensable role of transportation in our lives. For that reason, significant numbers of vehicles are used by humans

lead

Wrong verb form

leading

show examples

to the rising volume of traffic and even contamination issues.

Hence

, increasing the cost of fossil fuel is considered by some individuals to be the optimal method to address that matter. As for me, I am partial with

this

way. The following essay will clarify both viewpoints and my perspective. On the one hand, if the government sells high-value petroleum, the amount of fossil fuel gases which are discharged to provoke atmosphere pollution will be reduced by

this

solution

also

the street will become unobstructed without vehicles on the road.

Instead

of driving private vehicles, residents are going to choose mass transit to save money like trains, buses, and the subway,… So that,

this

proposal is able to solve the contamination of the air and the traffic-related problems more easily

also

the dweller’s health will not be affected by the air and will be guaranteed.

On the other hand

, higher the price of petrol is able to address the traffic-related and other problems which are associated with environmental well-being, but

this

way can not work out the trouble of the economy.

For example

, for those who earn a majority of their income from the taxi driver’s career, the increase in gasoline will make them struggle

while

running on a tight budget or perhaps even

this

way will make them give up their livelihood.

Besides

, in countries that are developing and don’t have a metro or underdeveloped public transportation system, the problem appears to be more severe and tough to resolve.