Throughout history, male leaders have led us into violence and conflict. If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is argued that male political

leaders

have led us to historical blood baths and violence.

In contrast

to, women

leaders

around the globe.

However

, I wholeheartedly disagree with the given notion and I will try to explain my point of view in

this

essay. The primary reason for not supporting

this

notion because male commanders have incited more violence is impossible to quantify. Most of the

leaders

have been men in history, and the mathematically ruling percentage of men is far bigger than their counterparts. So, practical comparison can not be executed between men and women commanders,

therefore

It is impossible to justify that male

leaders

have led us to wars and violence

due to

their impulsive tendency of involved in fights on worldwide levels.

Furthermore

, Another reason associated

for

Change preposition

with

show examples

not standing with

this

notion is that female

leaders

have

also

been part of a few historical violent events.

For instance

, despite

being

Unnecessary verb

apply

show examples

a woman Queen Victoria herself, the Victorian Age is notorious for creating havoc in distinct parts of the world in the name of colonization and expansion. The same could be applied to the Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi. Orders were initiated

by

Change preposition

for

show examples

her to invade East Pakistan, and she was responsible for creating a new nation Bangladesh out of Pakistan.

Thus

, female leadership have not always been peaceful. In conclusion, If we look back at history most of the wars were ignited by masculine

leaders

whereas

peace was not brought by feminine

leaders

as well so, despite the argument that females would lead more peacefully, it cannot be attainable practically.