More and more qualified people are moving from poor countries to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine . some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people , rich countries are stealing from poor countries.others feel that this is the only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. discuss the both points of views.

In today's world, the number of skilled workers who immigrate to wealthy

countries

for job opportunities has increased, which causes an argument that

such

movement means the outflow of

specialists

from

countries

in poverty. Meanwhile, the opposite claims that it is a reasonable

trend

. I agree with the latter opinion in terms of global advancement and the possibility of development in disadvantaged

countries

. On the one hand, the movement of skilled workers from poor

countries

results in enforcing economic disparity between impoverished

countries

and affluent ones.

This

is because

specialists

might enrich

countries

where they moved to through their abilities,

while

their home

countries

would suffer from the lack of specialized workforce even though governments have invested in their higher education.

Moreover

,

this

trend

causes a lack of successful model cases in developing

countries

, which may lead

countries

in poverty to an undeveloping spiral.

On the other hand

,

this

trend

could accelerate innovations and global progress through cultural and intellectual exchanges.

For example

, by moving to other

countries

, promising

specialists

could display their abilities that might remain hidden if they stay in impoverished nations.

Furthermore

, migrant

specialists

can enhance their home

countries

’ working or studying environment. They can bring economic contributions to their homelands,

such

as establishing educational institutions and introducing new technologies, with foreign investment and aid. These contributions lead disadvantaged areas to economic and technological development. In conclusion, it is true that there are both negative and positive sides to

this

trend

.

However

, I believe that the migration of

specialists

possibly brings opportunities to develop both worldwide and their home nations through affluent

countries

’ financial support.