Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leaders. Other think that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Nowadays, teamwork has become more popular to yield optimal outcomes. Some assume that
leaders
should have a natural potential to administrate their duties, while
others believe that this
skill can be learned practically. It will be discussed both views in the following essay.
According to
the experts' views, a positive relationship between people's talent and their genes is accepted and demonstrated in their research. In addition
, we have an array of examples of leaders
all over the world who have lived in the high levels of families in their countries, such
as kings. Moreover
, they believe that living in these conditions can prepare suitable situations to build up their leadership abilities from their childhood. Eventually, they reject that leadership can be defined as a skill which can be learned by everybody.
On the other hand
, others hold the position that leaders
are not naturally capable of this
ability. Additionally
, if they do not work on their skills, they will never achieve in the future. However
, they do not reject the importance of the conditions in which a person lives there which can affect their skills to be a good leader. For instance
, Gandy in India, who had lived in the poor without any background in his ancestors, started the Indian revolution as a not only popular but also
a prospective leader. Nevertheless
, should they do their best in reaching this
aim.
To sum up
, I opine that leadership is one skill which can be taught by prosperous leaders
to transfer their knowledge, although
, a gifted person has more chances to yield optimal outcomes. Furthermore
, I strongly believe that this
capability is not overshadowed by our talents.Submitted by mortezashamsa on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While your essay clearly responds to the task and covers both views, it would be beneficial to delve into deeper analysis or provide more specific examples to bolster your points.
coherence cohesion
Your ideas are generally clear and comprehensive, but working on your transitions between paragraphs and ensuring all ideas are fully developed and not repetitive can enhance clarity.
task achievement
Improve the accuracy and variability of examples. The mention of 'Gandy' seems to be a spelling mistake and needs correction to 'Gandhi'. Also, specific examples were a bit vague.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, making it easy to follow your argument.
coherence cohesion
You have made a logical structure in presenting both sides of the argument before giving your own opinion, which helps the reader follow along.
task achievement
The essay is comprehensive in addressing the main points related to the topic, covering aspects like natural potential and the ability to learn leadership.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?