As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people travelling, there is a growing demand for more flights. What problems does this have on the environment? What measures could be taken to solve the problems?

In today’s world, where environmental challenges are accelerating at a high rate, the carbon footprint left by human activities is a growing concern. One of the main contributors

being

Wrong verb form

is

show examples

air

transport with long-distance

flights

consuming a huge amount of

fuel

and releasing harmful

emissions

. There's arguing that limiting

flights

,

for

instance

Add the comma(s)

instance,

show examples

tourist

travel

, would be more effective in reducing

pollution

than limiting

car

use

. In

this

essay

Add a comma

essay,

show examples

I will explore

both

sides of

this

argument. One of the strongest arguments for limiting non-essential

flights

is the huge amount of

fuel

they consume compared to

cars

. A single long-distance flight can

use

up the same amount of

fuel

a

car

might

use

over several years.

Moreover

,

pollution

released by planes is making the situation of the greenhouse effect worse. As international journeys soar in popularity, especially for tourism, the

emissions

from

air

travel

have surged, and by that taking a part in

to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

the global environmental crisis.

Thus

, reducing non-essential

flights

could significantly cut down on

emissions

and place us on the right track toward sustainability.

On the other hand

,

cars

are all over the place compared to planes. Even though a flight might consume more

fuel

in one journey, the daily

use

of millions of

cars

globally leads to continuous

pollution

, making it much worse.

Car

transportation is on average 57% higher than

air

transports

Fix the agreement mistake

transport

show examples

. CO2 emission from vehicles is skyrocketing, and limiting

car

use

could absolutely help to reduce

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

pollution

a lot. Encouraging and developing public transportation and eco-friendly alternatives,

such

as electric vehicles, might

also

help with reducing the greenhouse effect. A practical solution to

this

problem would involve addressing

both

air

travel

and

car

usage. Discouraging non-essential

flights

could help reduce the impact of

air

travel

on the environment, but a complete focus on

this

would overlook the

pollution

caused by

cars

.

Government

Correct article usage

The government

show examples

should take steps to limit

both

sectors by offering advantages for electric vehicle owners,

while

simultaneously promoting eco-friendly

travel

options,

could

Correct pronoun usage

which could

show examples

lead to a

more

Correct word choice

greater

show examples

reduction in

emissions

. In conclusion,

while

it is clear that

long-distance

flights

contribute significantly to

pollution

, focusing only on reducing tourist

travel

would not be enough.

Both

air

travel

and

car

usage must be addressed to the issue of accelerating environmental crisis.

Further

down the road, a balanced approach that targets

both

sectors would be the most effective solution in reducing

emissions

and ensuring a sustainable future.