In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing high speed railway lines for inter-city travel. Others believe this money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is believed that it is better to allocate a significant amount of money to building
high speed
railway Add a hyphen
high-speed
lines
for traveling
between neighbourhoods in Change the spelling
travelling
city
. Some others claim that Add an article
the city
this
budget should be spend
on old public Change the verb form
be spent
transpot
improvement. I agree with the opinion of the benefits of spending money on Correct your spelling
transport
new
transportation Correct article usage
a new
system
for some reasons which will be discussed in this
essay.
Obviously, the time people spend on
Change preposition
apply
traveling
inside a city can be reduced by using cutting-edge Change the spelling
travelling
high speed
trains, and it is the first reason I support the idea. Add a hyphen
high-speed
Furthermore
, new infrastructures can be built based on the latest technology available to increase efficiency and convenience. Finally
, creating something new is faster and easier than repairing an existing system
such
as transportation
Correct article usage
a transportation
system
, as repairing needs the determination of the problem first and then
solving it. In contrast
, construction
of an entire Correct article usage
the construction
system
like railway lines
from
the first place does not require Change preposition
in
the
time Correct article usage
apply
spending
on finding the problem. It only demands Replace the word
spent
engeneerings
to plan the scheme and start.
Correct your spelling
engineering
engineerings
On the other hand
, some existing public transport sections, such
as vehicles, stations and lines
, may be
noticeably outdated so they cannot be maintained and improved properly. Correct your spelling
maybe
Therefore
, spending the available funding on them is a waste of money. It is better to leave the old-fashioned transport system
as it is.
In conclusion, the funding allocating
to constructing a new web of railway Wrong verb form
allocated
lines
for high speed
subways can help citizens to travel in a city in a shorter time, and It is Add a hyphen
high-speed
also
more comfortable and faster. Moreover
, it can cut down the energy of distinguishing an issue in the existing transport system
.Submitted by ava.saljoughi on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Ensure that all ideas are clearly presented and elaborated upon. Better examples and more comprehensive analysis for both sides of the argument will strengthen the essay.
coherence cohesion
Avoid repetitions and ensure that each paragraph follows logically from the previous one. Transitions between sentences and paragraphs could be smoother.
coherence cohesion
The essay presents a clear introduction and conclusion, which provides a structured layout.
task achievement
The argument for high-speed railway construction is reasonably developed, with some relevant points provided to support the perspective.