It is often highlighted that a single long-distance flight consumes the same amount of fuel that a
might
over several years,
cause comparable levels of
.
has led some to argue that we should discourage non-essential
,
of focusing on limiting
usage.
I agree that reducing non-essential
can help address global
, I believe that a balanced approach is required, targeting
and
usage, as
contribute significantly to environmental harm.
There are valid reasons to discourage
from
non - essentialCorrect your spelling
show examples
, especially the ones associated with tourism.
contributes significantly to global
, which in turn causes
rapidAdd an article
show examples
rise
ofChange preposition
show examples
global warming.
AviationCorrect article usage
show examples
IEA database, the number of CO2 emissions between 2022 and 2024
haveChange the verb form
show examples
doubled, reaching an
all timeAdd a hyphen
show examples
high. Skyrocketing global warming, as a whole, has a very negative effect on
's health.
: it causes confusion, increased cardiac output, elevated blood pressure and increased arrhythmias.
, in recent years, there
isWrong verb form
show examples
a major growth
ofChange preposition
show examples
deaths associated with
. Another reason to discourage
from non-essential
is our
environmentReplace the word
show examples
loss
the greenhouse effect. Growing
has caused significant losses to our home:
climateCorrect word choice
show examples
change is already affecting Europe in various forms, depending on the region. It can possibly lead to biodiversity loss, forest fires, decreasing crop fields and higher temperatures.
, there is a big
riseCorrect your spelling
show examples
of more severe storms,droughts and poverty.
may have a bigger and higher environmental cost per journey,
remain the most widely used mode of
globally, and their impact is substantial, especially in urban areas. One of the solutions would be to limit the
of
per household and
, which doesn't pollute our
, to cover smaller distances, since a lot of households have more
thenReplace the word
show examples
one
, which substantially increases CO2 emissions and
need to get used to
travelingChange the spelling
show examples
with eco-friendly
.
could massively lower the
, causing a more eco-friendly
. Another solution would be for
to
public transport
of
. Even though
are our everyday transport, public
is really well developed in most of the European countries. There are a lot of alternatives
as
bussesCorrect your spelling
show examples
,
trolley busesCorrect your spelling
show examples
, metros, etc.
would
massively lower the CO2 emissions in our
In conclusion,
discouraging non-essential
can play a significant role in reducing
, it is not a solution in isolation. A better approach that addresses
and
is needed to tackle
challengesCorrect article usage
show examples
we face. By promoting alternatives to
modes of transport and encouraging more sustainable
across the board, we can make meaningful progress in reducing
and combating climate change.