Some people think government should spent money on languages that are dying and a few number of people uses them, some think this is a waste of resources. Discuss both views and tell what's your take on this issue.

ome
Correct your spelling
some
people argued about spending the government money on
languages
that are dying.
While
some of them think it is a waste of funds, I believe
that is
more important to keep money to provide a better environment for nations
instead
of spending it on rare
languages
. On the one hand, some of them believe that the implementation of government expenditure on rare
languages
is a crucial way to preserve the diversity of
languages
and the culture of countries.
For example
, a recent study shows that China has different
languages
in villages and cities.
While
I believe there is no need for these diversities.
On the other hand
, the advantages of inserting these expenditures in improving health and contributing to the development of the country outweigh the spending of these funds on
languages
.
This
is because the English language has become more popular among residents and the benefits of keeping the money for living standards is more beneficial.
For instance
, it has been shown the United States is one of the advanced countries and they speak one language. I believe that we should consider people’s life essentials rather than wasting them. In conclusion, spending a lot of expenditure on rare
languages
to preserve the diversity and the culture of these cities is logical for most nations. Most people these days tend to use only two
languages
and there are different aspects of our lives that need consideration. I recommended the government should make a survey and see if the benefits will overcome the disadvantages or not.
Submitted by rraghad.b on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
The essay is clear about your stance on the issue, but the argument needs more development. Including more specific examples and a deeper analysis of both views would strengthen your essay.
coherence cohesion
The essay's structure is generally logical, but the transitions between points could be smoother. Using more linking words and phrases can help with this.
coherence cohesion
Some parts of the essay are less clear due to grammatical issues. Reviewing and polishing your grammar could help make your points more comprehensible.
task response
The introduction clearly states the topic and your position on it, which is a good start.
task response
You provided a balanced discussion by addressing both sides of the issue, which is important for this essay type.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: