In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in the number of individuals discussing the creation of high-speed rail networks and their effects on various aspects of daily life. Some argue that developing fast train
systems
will transform transportation and boost economic activity, while
critics strongly oppose this
view and contend that it can lead to excessive costs and possible inefficiency. In this
essay, it will be argued that a balance between modernizing existing public transport and building new railways is crucial for optimal regional and urban development.
To begin
with, there is an argument to be made that high-speed rail infrastructure would offer substantial benefits for several reasons, foremost being the promotion of economic growth through better city-to-city connectivity. For instance
, nations such
as China and France have experienced a notable rise in business traffic and tourism after the implementation of rapid train systems
. For
this
reason, it is evident that these transport solutions have enhanced business opportunities and tourism, contributing to a healthier economy.
On the other hand
, there is a widespread belief that improving current public transit systems
is more sensible, which can help alleviate traffic problems and benefit both rural and urban populations. This
perspective is supported by the example of cities like Berlin and Hong Kong, where enhancing metro and bus networks has led to more reliable, affordable, and eco-friendly transportation options. Thereafter
, it is clear that
revamping current infrastructure is often more practical and reaches a wider range of people.
In conclusion, while
the importance of introducing fast train systems
is evident due to
their potential to drive economic benefits and improve connectivity, the significance of upgrading public transport networks cannot be overstated. A balanced strategy that supports both enhancements to existing transit systems
and the development of high-speed trains where necessary is essential for sustainable progress and effective transportation.Submitted by tahsin.adam3 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
To further improve your Task Response, consider including more specific examples, such as mentioning particular projects and their outcomes. This could strengthen your arguments and make them more convincing.
coherence cohesion
For a better Coherence and Cohesion score, make sure to use more varied linking words and phrases to ensure smooth transitions between ideas and paragraphs.
introduction conclusion present
The essay has a clear and well-organized introduction and conclusion, which effectively frame the discussion.
logical structure
The logical structure of the essay is strong, with each paragraph building on the previous one to develop the argument cohesively.
supported main points
The main points are well-supported with relevant examples and reasoning, making the arguments compelling and well-rounded.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?