Historical objects in museums all over the worlshould be returned to their country of origin. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The
repatriation
of historical
objects
to their country of origin is a complex issue that requires careful consideration.
While
I lean towards the belief that
such
repatriation
is often justified, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. On one hand, returning historical
objects
can be seen as an act of justice, particularly when these items were obtained during colonial periods,
such
as the
artifacts
Change the spelling
artefacts
show examples
looted from the Old Summer Palace in China by the
British
and French forces during the Second Opium War. Items like the renowned Zodiac Animal Heads, originally part of the fountain in the European-style gardens of the Old Summer Palace, were taken and have since become a potent symbol of cultural loss. The return of
such
objects
can help heal historical wounds and is a step towards recognizing the rights of source countries, as seen in the efforts to retrieve the Female History Scroll, a painting by Gu Kaizhi from the Eastern Jin Dynasty, which was looted and now resides in the
British
Museum.
Moreover
, the acquisition of many historical
objects
was often tied to colonialism and imperialism, which involved the exploitation and subjugation of other cultures. Returning these
objects
can be seen as a way to redress past wrongs and to acknowledge the agency and autonomy of the countries from which they were taken.
For instance
, the return of the Bronze Tiger Ying, a significant piece believed to be from the Zhou Dynasty and looted from the Old Summer Palace, has been a subject of international discussions and efforts.
However
, there are
also
strong arguments for retaining these
objects
in museums where they currently reside. Museums like the
British
Museum have the resources and expertise to preserve and display these
objects
, ensuring their longevity and accessibility to a wide audience.
Additionally
, these museums often provide a global context for these
objects
, allowing visitors to understand their significance in a broader historical and cultural framework. The case of the Yongle Encyclopedia, a monumental work from the Ming Dynasty, of which only a few volumes remain and are scattered across various collections, including those in the
British
Museum, illustrates the complexity of
repatriation
when the
artifacts
Change the spelling
artefacts
show examples
are part of a larger historical narrative. In conclusion,
while
the idea of returning historical
objects
to their country of origin is compelling, it is essential to approach
this
issue with nuance. A case-by-case evaluation that respects
cultural
Add an article
the cultural
show examples
heritage, acknowledges historical context
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
and considers the capacity for preservation and display in the country of origin is crucial. The dialogue between nations and institutions for the
repatriation
of cultural
artifacts
Change the spelling
artefacts
show examples
like the Zodiac Animal Heads and the Female History Scroll must be conducted with the utmost respect for the cultural significance these
objects
hold for the nations from which they were taken.
Submitted by tl868 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
While the essay provides a comprehensive and relevant response to the task, enhancing the depth of analysis on potential counterarguments could add even more weight to your argument. Acknowledging and addressing potential criticisms of repatriation could strengthen the overall persuasiveness of the essay.
coherence and cohesion
The ideas in the essay are well-organized and follow a logical progression. To further improve coherence, consider using more varied transitional phrases to connect ideas and sections seamlessly. This could make the argument flow even more smoothly.
task achievement
The essay skillfully integrates specific and relevant examples, such as the return of the Female History Scroll and the Bronze Tiger Ying, to support the main points. These examples significantly strengthen the argument and make it more compelling.
coherence and cohesion
The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The logical organization helps the reader follow the argument easily, which enhances overall readability and persuasiveness.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: