Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?
Using animals for research purposes has sparked considerable debate among the public. Many people advocate that animal experimentation is indispensable for gaining ground in the field of science
while
others strongly condemn such
scientific pursuits. From my perspective, it is unethical to exploit living things for these practices as there are alternatives that could be utilized.
To commence with, one justification for rejecting the application of animals in scientific ventures is that it is undoubtedly immoral to risk the lives of other creatures to benefit humans. In other words
, treating brutally with animals, for the sake of observation that mostly ends up without a conclusion, is unacceptable. Sometimes the findings of the experiment are not even valuable. The quest for development has actually disrupted the ecosystem, making many species endangered. For instance
, some species of mice have disappeared because of their unrestrained usage in various observations. Clearly, it does more harm than good by disturbing the whole food chain.
Turning to alternative approaches, recent advances in alternative methods, such
as computational, biochemical, or cell-based model systems that can replicate human biology, have been shown in some cases to perform the same as or even better than standard animal models. Researchers are employing mathematical and computational models for toxicity measurement of various samples. Similarly
, testing cells and tissues in test tubes in laboratories has made it possible to profoundly examine the poisonous substances within the sample.
To conclude
, inflicting one organism to cure the other seems morally unethical and unjustifiable. Therefore
, sacrificing fauna must be strictly halted and the state should ensure the conservation of brutes, particularly endangered ones.Submitted by muaaztousif2105 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While the essay provides a clear stance against animal experimentation, its argument could be strengthened with more specific examples or studies to back up the points made, such as specific scientific breakthroughs or examples where non-animal alternatives have been successfully used.
task achievement
The essay could benefit from deeper elaboration on how the alternatives specifically replicate or improve upon animal testing, offering specific examples. Additionally, the arguments could further explore counterpoints and rebuttals for a more balanced view.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph logically transitions to the next to improve the flow of ideas. The connection between the drawbacks of animal testing and alternative methods could be more directly linked to improve cohesion.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, effectively outlining the writer's position against animal experimentation. The viewpoint remains consistent throughout the essay, reinforcing the task response.
task achievement
Complex sentences and a varied vocabulary have been used well to articulate the ideas – a sign of a strong command of language.
task achievement
The essay addresses both the ethical concerns and the alternatives to animal testing, showing a comprehensive approach to the topic.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.